Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 13;16(5):e60201.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.60201. eCollection 2024 May.

Enhancing Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: The Multifaceted Advantages, Limitations, and Future Directions of 3D Printing Technology

Affiliations
Review

Enhancing Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: The Multifaceted Advantages, Limitations, and Future Directions of 3D Printing Technology

Wael Barakeh et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

In the evolving field of orthopedic surgery, the integration of three-dimensional printing (3D printing) has emerged as a transformative technology, particularly in addressing the rising incidence of degenerative joint diseases. The integration of 3D printing technology in hip arthroplasty offers substantial advantages throughout the surgical process. In preoperative planning, 3D models enable meticulous assessments, aiding in accurate implant selection and precise surgical strategies. Intraoperatively, the technology contributes to precise prosthesis design, reducing operation duration, X-ray exposures, and blood loss. Beyond surgery, 3D printing revolutionizes medical equipment production, imaging, and implant design, showcasing benefits such as enhanced osseointegration and reduced stress shielding with titanium cups. Challenges include a higher risk of postoperative infection due to the porous surfaces of 3D-printed implants, technical complexities in the printing process, and the need for skilled manpower. Despite these challenges, the evolving nature of 3D printing technologies underscores the importance of relying on existing orthopedic surgical practices while emphasizing the need for standardized guidelines to fully harness its potential in improving patient care.

Keywords: 3d model; hip arthroplasty; orthopedic; surgery; three-dimensional printing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Steps of 3D printing of a model.
Author credit: Wael Barakeh This image was developed by the author and not taken from anywhere else.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Application of 3D printing in hip and knee arthroplasty: a narrative review. Kumar P, Vatsya P, Rajnish RK, Hooda A, Dhillon MS. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55:14–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clinical and radiological outcomes in three-dimensional printing assisted revision total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Zhang R, Lin J, Chen F, Liu W, Chen M. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:495. - PMC - PubMed
    1. 3D printing of ceramic-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: an overview. Du X, Fu S, Zhu Y. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6:4397–4412. - PubMed
    1. Three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgery: current applications and future developments. Wixted CM, Peterson JR, Kadakia RJ, Adams SB. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021;5:0–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–785. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources