Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2024 Feb 11;3(1):e172.
doi: 10.1002/imt2.172. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Synthetic microbial communities: Sandbox and blueprint for soil health enhancement

Affiliations
Editorial

Synthetic microbial communities: Sandbox and blueprint for soil health enhancement

Mei Li et al. Imeta. .

Abstract

We summarize here the use of SynComs in improving various dimensions of soil health, including fertility, pollutant removal, soil-borne disease suppression, and soil resilience; as well as a set of useful guidelines to assess and understand the principles for designing SynComs to enhance soil health. Finally, we discuss the next stages of SynComs applications, including highly diverse and multikingdom SynComs targeting several functions simultaneously.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) play essential roles in soil health improvement. SynComs applications for soil fertility restoration by improving soil structure or promoting nutrient cycling and bioavailability (A), for soil bioremediation through microbial synergy or by microbes in conjunction with plants (B), for soil‐borne disease suppression (C) and soil resilience improvement by microbial interactions or microbe‐plant interactions (D). The graphic was created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Principles for designing efficient SynComs to enhance soil health. (A) Keystone species and their “helper” species, (B) biodiversity, and (C) microbial interactions should be considered when designing SynComs to enhance soil health. The graphic was created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. Tsoi, Ryan , Wu Feilun, Zhang Carolyn, Bewick Sharon, Karig David, and You Lingchong. 2018. “Metabolic Division of Labor in Microbial Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115: 2526–2531. 10.1073/pnas.1716888115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coban, Oksana , De Deyn Gerlinde B., and van der Ploeg Martine. 2022. “Soil Microbiota as Game‐Changers in Restoration of Degraded Lands.” Science 375: abe0725. 10.1126/science.abe0725 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caesar‐TonThat, The Can , Espeland Erin, Caesar Anthony J., Sainju Upendra M., Lartey Robert T., and Gaskin John F.. 2013. “Effects of Agaricus Lilaceps Fairy Rings on Soil Aggregation and Microbial Community Structure in Relation to Growth Stimulation of Western Wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii) in Eastern Montana Rangeland.” Microbial Ecology 66: 120–131. 10.1007/s00248-013-0194-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erktan, Amandine , Rillig Matthias C., Carminati Andrea, Jousset Alexandre, and Scheu Stefan. 2020. “Bacterial and Fungal Predator—Prey Interactions Modulate Soil Aggregation.” Biogeosciences Discussions 1–31. 10.5194/bg-2020-48 - DOI
    1. Wang, Juanjuan , Li Ruochen, Zhang Hui, Wei Gehong, and Li Zhefei. 2020. “Beneficial Bacteria Activate Nutrients and Promote Wheat Growth Under Conditions of Reduced Fertilizer Application.” BMC Microbiology 20: 38. 10.1186/s12866-020-1708-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources