Cell proliferation and carcinogenesis: an approach to screening for potential human carcinogens
- PMID: 38868530
- PMCID: PMC11168196
- DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1394584
Cell proliferation and carcinogenesis: an approach to screening for potential human carcinogens
Abstract
Cancer arises from multiple genetic errors occurring in a single stem cell (clonality). Every time DNA replicates, mistakes occur. Thus, agents can increase the risk of cancer either by directly damaging DNA (DNA-reactive carcinogens) or increasing the number of DNA replications (increased cell proliferation). Increased cell proliferation can be achieved either by direct mitogenesis or cytotoxicity with regenerative proliferation. Human carcinogens have a mode of action of DNA reactivity, immunomodulation (mostly immunosuppression), increased estrogenic activity (mitogenesis), or cytotoxicity and regeneration. By focusing on screening for these four effects utilizing in silico, in vitro, and short-term in vivo assays, a biologically based screening for human chemical carcinogens can be accomplished with greater predictivity than the traditional 2-year bioassay with considerably less cost, less time, and the use of fewer animals.
Keywords: cell proliferation; cytotoxicity; estrogenic activity; immunosuppression; mutagenesis; regenerative proliferation; two-year bioassay.
Copyright © 2024 Cohen.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
An enhanced 13-week bioassay: an alternative to the 2-year bioassay to screen for human carcinogenesis.Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2010 Sep;62(5):497-502. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2009.06.011. Epub 2009 Jul 17. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2010. PMID: 19616417
-
Role of cell proliferation in regenerative and neoplastic disease.Toxicol Lett. 1995 Dec;82-83:15-21. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03542-7. Toxicol Lett. 1995. PMID: 8597044 Review.
-
Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 3: Risk assessment of carcinogenic potential based on the current state of knowledge of carcinogenesis in humans.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Apr;103:100-105. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 8. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 30634021 Review.
-
An enhanced thirteen-week bioassay as an alternative for screening for carcinogenesis factors.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(1):15-7. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010. PMID: 20593920
-
Screening for human urinary bladder carcinogens: two-year bioassay is unnecessary.Toxicol Res (Camb). 2018 Jan 23;7(4):565-575. doi: 10.1039/c7tx00294g. eCollection 2018 Jul 1. Toxicol Res (Camb). 2018. PMID: 30090607 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Challenges in defining thresholds for health effects: some considerations for asbestos and silica.Front Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 17;5:1557023. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2025.1557023. eCollection 2025. Front Epidemiol. 2025. PMID: 40166649 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An evaluation of the human relevance of the hepatocellular tumors observed in mice treated with synthetic fungicide, pyridachlometyl, based on mode of action.Arch Toxicol. 2025 Sep;99(9):3803-3824. doi: 10.1007/s00204-025-04099-9. Epub 2025 Jun 9. Arch Toxicol. 2025. PMID: 40488882
References
-
- Cohen SM. The relevance of experimental carcinogenicity studies to human safety. Curr Opin Toxicol. (2017) 3:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cotox.2017.04.002 - DOI
-
- Cohen SM, Boobis AR, Dellarco VL, Doe JE, Fenner-Crisp PA, Moretto A, et al. . Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 3: Risk assessment of carcinogenic potential based on the current state of modern knowledge of carcinogenesis in humans. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol. (2019) 103:100–5. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.017 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources