Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 11;5(1):e387.
doi: 10.1002/deo2.387. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonographic shear wave elastography for assessing early chronic pancreatitis using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019

Affiliations

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonographic shear wave elastography for assessing early chronic pancreatitis using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019

Shuhei Shintani et al. DEN Open. .

Abstract

Background and aim: Endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS-SWE) can facilitate an objective evaluation of pancreatic fibrosis. Although it is primarily applied in evaluating chronic pancreatitis, its efficacy in assessing early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) remains underinvestigated. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-SWE for assessing ECP diagnosed using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019.

Methods: In total, 657 patients underwent EUS-SWE. Propensity score matching was used, and the participants were classified into the ECP and normal groups. ECP was diagnosed using the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019. Pancreatic stiffness was assessed based on velocity (Vs) on EUS-SWE, and the optimal Vs cutoff value for ECP diagnosis was determined. A practical shear wave Vs value of ≥50% was considered significant.

Results: Each group included 22 patients. The ECP group had higher pancreatic stiffness than the normal group (2.31 ± 0.67 m/s vs. 1.59 ± 0.40 m/s, p < 0.001). The Vs cutoff value for the diagnostic accuracy of ECP, as determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve, was 2.24m/s, with an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.94). A high Vs was strongly correlated with the number of EUS findings (rs = 0.626, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that a history of acute pancreatitis and ≥2 EUS findings were independent predictors of a high Vs.

Conclusions: There is a strong correlation between EUS-SWE findings and the Japanese diagnostic criteria 2019 for ECP. Hence, EUS-SWE can be an objective and invaluable diagnostic tool for ECP diagnosis.

Keywords: acute pancreatitis; pancreatic fibrosis; propensity score; regression analysis; shear wave elastography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The mechanism of endoscopic ultrasound shear wave elastography (EUS‐SWE). A shear wave is generated by applying a push pulse from the probe to the target organ. The hardness of the organ is estimated by measuring the velocity of the shear wave (Vs, m/s) with a search pulse. The percentage of the net amount of effective shear wave velocity (VsN, %), which indicates the reliability of the Vs, is measured simultaneously.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flow diagram. In total, 657 patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We excluded 284 patients with intrapapillary mucinous neoplasm, 45 with chronic pancreatitis, 185 with malignant disease, 56 with other diseases, and two with insufficient data on EUS‐shear wave elastography findings. Finally, 34 patients with early chronic pancreatitis and 53 without pancreatic diseases were evaluated. After propensity score matching, 22 patients from each group were included in the analysis.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison of velocity (Vs) values between the early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) and normal groups. The Vs values of the ECP group were significantly higher than the normal group's (p < 0.001).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) of the velocity (Vs) values for early chronic pancreatitis. The ROC analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.69–0.94). The Vs cutoff value for the diagnostic accuracy of ECP was 2.24 m/s.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Correlation coefficient between velocity (Vs) values and the number of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) findings. The Vs values and the total number of EUS findings were significantly correlated (rs = 0.626, p < 0.001).

References

    1. Witt H, Apte MV, Keim V, Wilson JS. Chronic pancreatitis: Challenges and advances in pathogenesis, genetics, diagnosis, and therapy. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 1557–1573. - PubMed
    1. Braganza JM, Lee SH, McCloy RF, McMahon MJ. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet North Am Ed 2011; 377: 1184–1197. - PubMed
    1. Whitcomb DC, Frulloni L, Garg P et al. Chronic pancreatitis: An international draft consensus proposal for a new mechanistic definition. Pancreatology 2016; 16: 218–224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh VK, Yadav D, Garg PK. Diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis: A review. JAMA 2019; 322: 2422–2434. - PubMed
    1. Whitcomb DC, Shimosegawa T, Chari ST et al. International consensus statements on early chronic Pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with The International Association of Pancreatology, American Pancreatic Association, Japan Pancreas Society, PancreasFest Working Group and European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology 2018; 18: 516–527. - PMC - PubMed