Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2024 Jun;52(6):3000605241258572.
doi: 10.1177/03000605241258572.

Heterotopic pregnancy: a case report of intrauterine hydatidiform mole with tubal pregnancy

Affiliations
Case Reports

Heterotopic pregnancy: a case report of intrauterine hydatidiform mole with tubal pregnancy

Ruoxi Wang et al. J Int Med Res. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

We herein report a rare case of simultaneous intrauterine molar pregnancy and tubal pregnancy. A woman of childbearing age who had never been pregnant underwent an ultrasound examination 70 days after the onset of menopause. She had a history of ovulation induction. The ultrasound findings suggested a partial hydatidiform mole. She was then pathologically confirmed to have a complete hydatidiform mole after uterine suction dilation and curettage. On postoperative day 4, an ultrasound examination before discharge showed an inhomogeneous mass in the left adnexal region with mild lower abdominal pain. On postoperative day 17, the blood human chorionic gonadotropin level did not drop as expected, and a follow-up examination still indicated a mass in the left adnexal region. We were unable to rule out an ectopic hydatidiform mole. Hysteroscopy with laparoscopic exploration of the left adnexal mass and salpingotomy suggested a diagnosis of intrauterine hydatidiform mole combined with left tubal pregnancy.

Keywords: Heterotopic pregnancy; case report; dilation and curettage; human chorionic gonadotropin; intrauterine hydatidiform mole; tubal pregnancy; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diagnostic imaging and surgical findings. (a) Pelvic ultrasound images. (b) Pelvic magnetic resonance images. (c, d) Findings of laparoscopic exploration. (e) Pregnancy tissue in the fallopian tube and (f) histopathological section of left tubal pregnancy (hematoxylin and eosin, 20×).

Similar articles

References

    1. Harzif AK, Hyaswicaksono P, Kurniawan RH, et al.. Heterotopic pregnancy: diagnosis and pitfall in ultrasonography. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2021; 10: 53–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nabi U, Yousaf A, Ghaffar F, et al.. Heterotopic pregnancy – a diagnostic challenge. Six case reports and literature review. Cureus 2019; 11: e6080. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karkee R, Sharma A, Dangal B. Heterotopic pregnancy: a challenge in early diagnosis. J Nepal Health Res Counc 2019; 17: 413–415. - PubMed
    1. Didziokaite G, Vitaityte M, Zykute G, et al.. Angular heterotopic pregnancy: successful differential diagnosis, expectant management and postpartum care. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021; 57: 57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, CARE Group et al.. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Headache 2013; 53: 1541–1547. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources