Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2024 Nov;67(11):2375-2392.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06196-3.

EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): Executive Summary

Collaborators
Practice Guideline

EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): Executive Summary

European Association for the Study of the Liver et al. Diabetologia. 2024 Nov.

Erratum in

Abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is defined as steatotic liver disease (SLD) in the presence of one or more cardiometabolic risk factor(s) and the absence of harmful alcohol intake. The spectrum of MASLD includes steatosis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, previously NASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis and MASH-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This joint EASL-EASD-EASO guideline provides an update on definitions, prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment for MASLD. Case-finding strategies for MASLD with liver fibrosis, using non-invasive tests, should be applied in individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors, abnormal liver enzymes and/or radiological signs of hepatic steatosis, particularly in the presence of type 2 diabetes or obesity with additional metabolic risk factor(s). A stepwise approach using blood-based scores (such as the fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4]) and, sequentially, imaging techniques (such as transient elastography) is suitable to rule-out/in advanced fibrosis, which is predictive of liver-related outcomes. In adults with MASLD, lifestyle modification-including weight loss, dietary changes, physical exercise and discouraging alcohol consumption-as well as optimal management of comorbidities-including use of incretin-based therapies (e.g. semaglutide, tirzepatide) for type 2 diabetes or obesity, if indicated-is advised. Bariatric surgery is also an option in individuals with MASLD and obesity. If locally approved and dependent on the label, adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and significant liver fibrosis (stage ≥2) should be considered for a MASH-targeted treatment with resmetirom, which demonstrated histological effectiveness on steatohepatitis and fibrosis with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile. No MASH-targeted pharmacotherapy can currently be recommended for the cirrhotic stage. Management of MASH-related cirrhosis includes adaptations of metabolic drugs, nutritional counselling, surveillance for portal hypertension and HCC, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

Keywords: Diabetes; Glucagon-like peptide; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver fibrosis; MASH; MASLD; NAFLD; NASH; Non-invasive tests; Resmetirom.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Luca Valenti has disclosed speaking engagements with Viatris, Novo Nordisk, and GSK; consulting roles with Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Resalis, and MSD; and received unrestricted grant support from Gilead. Elisabetta Bugianesi serves as a consultant for Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and MSD. Amalia Gastaldelli has acted as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, and Metadeq Diagnostics; participated in advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, Metadeq Diagnostics, and Pfizer; and received speaker's honorarium or other fees from Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. Frank Tacke’s lab has received research funding from Gilead, AstraZeneca, and MSD (funding to the institution); he has received honoraria for consulting or lectures from AstraZeneca, Gilead, AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer, Intercept, Falk, Inventiva, MSD, GSK, Orphalan, Merz, Pfizer, Alnylam, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Novartis. Michael Roden has participated in consulting for and/or scientific advisory boards of BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, Echosens, Eli Lilly, Madrigal, MSD, Novo Nordisk, as well as in clinical trials supported by Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, and Nutricia/Danone. Paul Horn received grants from Novo Nordisk (through the University of Birmingham) and MSD (through Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin); speaking fees from Orphalan; and travel support from IPSEN. Hannele Yki-Järvinen declares no conflicts of interest regarding the present work. Shira Zelber-Sagi received travel support for attending a conference and honoraria for a lecture presentation in this conference by AbbVie, a one-time consulting fee by SIEMENS, and holds an unpaid leadership role as Chair-elect of the EASL public health committee. Vincent Wong has served as a consultant or advisory board member for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions, and Visirna; a speaker for Abbott, AbbVie, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk, and Unilab; received a research grant from Gilead Sciences, and is a co-founder of Illuminatio Medical Technology. Gema Frühbeck received payment of honoraria for attendance to Advisory Boards from Lilly, and Novo Nordisk as well as payment of honoraria for lectures as Member of the OPEN Spain Initiative. Sven Francque holds a senior clinical investigator fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) and has acted as consultant for Astellas, Falk Pharma, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, GlympsBio, Janssens Pharmaceutica, Inventiva, Merck Sharp & Dome, Pfizer, Roche. He has acted as consultant for Abbvie, Actelion, Aelin Therapeutics, AgomAb, Aligos Therapeutics, Allergan, Alnylam, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristoll-Meyers Squibb, CSL Behring, Coherus, Echosens, Dr. Falk Pharma, Eisai, Enyo, Galapagos, Galmed, Genetech, Genfit, Genflow Biosciences, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Janssens Pharmaceutica, PRO.MED.CS Praha, Julius Clinical, Madrigal, Medimmune, Merck Sharp & Dome, Mursla Bio, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Promethera, Roche, Siemens Healthineers, and lectured for for Abbvie, Allergan, Bayer, Eisai, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Janssens Cilag, Intercept, Inventiva, Merck Sharp & Dome, Novo Nordisk, Promethera, Siemens. Dror Dicker received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from NovoNordisk and Eli Lilly, and personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Vlad Ratziu serves as a consultant for Novo-Nordisk, Madrigal, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GSK, and 89 Bio; and has a grant to institution from MSD. Fritz Schick declares no conflict of interest pertaining to this article. Roberto Vettor has received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca, and has served on advisory boards for Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for SLD and its sub-categories [2]. SLD, diagnosed histologically or by imaging, has many potential aetiologies. MASLD is defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis in conjunction with (at least) one cardiometabolic risk factor and no other discernible cause. The quantity of alcohol intake, the drinking pattern, and the type of alcohol consumed should be assessed in all individuals with SLD using detailed medical history, psychometric instruments and/or validated biomarkers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proposed strategy for non-invasive assessment of the risk for advanced fibrosis and liver-related outcomes in individuals with metabolic risk factors or signs of SLD. Individuals with (1) type 2 diabetes or (2) abdominal obesity and ≥1 additional cardiometabolic risk factor(s) or (3) persistently elevated liver enzymes should undergo a multi-step diagnostic process, as indicated in the figure, to identify individuals with MASLD and advanced fibrosis. The algorithm can also be applied in case of incident finding of steatosis. This strategy is intended to identify individuals at risk of developing liver-related outcomes. MRE, magnetic resonance elastography; SWE, shear wave elastography
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Lifestyle management algorithm for MASLD. Behavioural therapy includes: self-monitoring, clinicians providing affected individuals with self-efficacy and motivation, setting realistic negotiable goals and overcoming barriers. Examples of unprocessed/minimally processed foods: vegetables, fruits (not juice), low-fat dairy, nuts, olive oil, legumes, unprocessed fish and poultry. Overweight/obesity: Overweight: BMI of 25–29.9 kg/m2 (non-Asian) or 23–24.9 (Asian), Obesity: ≥30 kg/m2 (non-Asian) ≥25 kg/m2 (Asian). Class II obesity: BMI ≥35 kg/m2 (non-Asian) or BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (Asian). Normal weight: BMI<25 kg/m2 (non-Asian) or <23 kg/m2 (Asian). T2D, type 2 diabetes
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Treatment recommendations beyond lifestyle modification in MASLD/MASH. The recommended choice of pharmacological treatment options in individuals with MASLD/MASH is dependent on comorbidities and stage of disease. T2D, type 2 diabetes
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Cardiovascular work-up algorithm in the evaluation of individuals with MASLD before liver transplantation. Adults with MASLD who are candidates for liver transplantation should be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team using a stepwise and risk-adjusted cardiac work-up algorithm to mitigate the risk of major cardiovascular events in the pre-, peri- and post-transplant phase (modified from [6, 7]). CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; CV, cardiovascular; DSE, dobutamine stress echocardiography; ECG, electrocardiogram; LT, liver transplantation; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography. *Indicates suboptimal sensitivity in high-risk populations

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Karlsen TH, Sheron N, Zelber-Sagi S et al (2022) The EASL-Lancet Liver Commission: protecting the next generation of Europeans against liver disease complications and premature mortality. Lancet 399(10319):61–116. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01701-3 - PubMed
    1. Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V et al (2023) A multi-society Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol 79(6):1542–56. 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.06.003 - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver (2016) EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 64(6):1388–402. 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004 - PubMed
    1. Younossi ZM, Paik JM, Stepanova M, Ong J, Alqahtani S, Henry L (2024) Clinical profiles and mortality rates are similar for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.01.014 - PubMed
    1. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. “The Oxford 2011 Levels of Evidence”. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. 2011. Available from: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-e.... Accessed 27 Jan 2023

Publication types

MeSH terms