3D printed scaffolds of biosilica and spongin from marine sponges: analysis of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity for bone tissue repair
- PMID: 38869621
- DOI: 10.1007/s00449-024-03042-z
3D printed scaffolds of biosilica and spongin from marine sponges: analysis of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity for bone tissue repair
Abstract
Biosilica (BS) and spongin (SPG) from marine sponges are highlighted for their potential to promote bone regeneration. Moreover, 3D printing is introduced as a technology for producing bone grafts with optimized porous structures, allowing for better cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Thus, this study aimed to characterize the BS and BS/SPG 3D printed scaffolds and to evaluate the biological effects in vitro. The scaffolds were printed using an ink containing 4 wt.% of sodium alginate. The physicochemical characteristics of BS and BS/SPG 3D printed scaffolds were analyzed by SEM, EDS, FTIR, porosity, evaluation of mass loss, and pH measurement. For in vitro analysis, the cellular viability of the MC3T3-E1 cell lineage was assessed using the AlamarBlue® assay and confocal microscopy, while genotoxicity and mineralization potential were evaluated through the micronucleus assay and Alizarin Red S, respectively. SEM analysis revealed spicules in BS, the fibrillar structure of SPG, and material degradation over the immersion period. FTIR indicated peaks corresponding to silicon oxide in BS samples and carbon oxide and amine in SPG samples. BS-SPG scaffolds exhibited higher porosity, while BS scaffolds displayed greater mass loss. pH measurements indicated a significant decrease induced by BS, which was mitigated by SPG over the experimental periods. In vitro studies demonstrated the biocompatibility and non-cytotoxicity of scaffold extracts. .Also, the scaffolds promoted cellular differentiation. The micronucleus test further confirmed the absence of genotoxicity. These findings suggest that 3D printed BS and BS/SPG scaffolds may possess desirable morphological and physicochemical properties, indicating in vitro biocompatibility.
Keywords: 3D printing; Biosilica; Bone scaffolds; Marine sponges; Spongin.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
3D Printed Scaffolds Manufactured with Biosilica from Marine Sponges for Bone Healing in a Cranial Defect in Rats.Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2023 Apr;25(2):259-271. doi: 10.1007/s10126-023-10202-x. Epub 2023 Mar 9. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2023. PMID: 36892731
-
In Vivo Effects of Biosilica and Spongin-Like Collagen Scaffolds on the Healing Process in Osteoporotic Rats.Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2024 Oct;26(5):1053-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10126-024-10356-2. Epub 2024 Aug 17. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2024. PMID: 39153015
-
Incorporation of Collagen from Marine Sponges (Spongin) into Hydroxyapatite Samples: Characterization and In Vitro Biological Evaluation.Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2019 Feb;21(1):30-37. doi: 10.1007/s10126-018-9855-z. Epub 2018 Sep 14. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2019. PMID: 30218326
-
Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 15;84:16-33. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039. Epub 2018 Nov 24. Acta Biomater. 2019. PMID: 30481607 Review.
-
Towards resorbable 3D-printed scaffolds for craniofacial bone regeneration.Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Dec;26 Suppl 1:188-195. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12645. Epub 2023 Mar 13. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023. PMID: 36866957 Review.
Cited by
-
Casting Skin Dressing Containing Extractions of the Organic Part of Marine Sponges for Wound Healing.ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2025 Jan 20;8(1):617-627. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.4c01497. Epub 2024 Dec 20. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2025. PMID: 39705707 Free PMC article.
-
RNA interference-mediated osteoprotegerin silencing increases the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand/osteoprotegerin ratio and promotes osteoclastogenesis.World J Stem Cells. 2025 Apr 26;17(4):101290. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i4.101290. World J Stem Cells. 2025. PMID: 40308885 Free PMC article.
-
Silver Nanoparticles in 3D Printing: A New Frontier in Wound Healing.ACS Omega. 2024 Sep 16;9(40):41107-41129. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04961. eCollection 2024 Oct 8. ACS Omega. 2024. PMID: 39398164 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lim J, Lee J, Yun H-S et al (2013) Comparison of bone regeneration rate in flat and long bone defects: calvarial and tibial bone. Tissue Eng Regen Med 10:336–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-013-1094-9 - DOI
-
- Wildemann B, Ignatius A, Leung F et al (2021) Non-union bone fractures. Nat Rev Dis Prim 7:57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00289-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baldwin P, Li DJ, Auston DA et al (2019) Autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes: clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery. J Orthop Trauma 33:203–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ortolani A, Bianchi M, Mosca M et al (2016) The prospective opportunities offered by magnetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review. Joints. 4:228–235. https://doi.org/10.11138/jts/2016.4.4.228 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Szcześ A, Hołysz L, Chibowski E (2017) Synthesis of hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 249:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.007 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources