Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;133(6):477-488.
doi: 10.1037/abn0000923. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

Unique versus shared neural correlates of externalizing psychopathology in late childhood

Affiliations

Unique versus shared neural correlates of externalizing psychopathology in late childhood

Samantha Perlstein et al. J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Childhood externalizing psychopathology is heterogeneous. Symptom variability in conduct disorder (CD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and callous-unemotional (CU) traits designate different subgroups of children with externalizing problems who have specific treatment needs. However, CD, ODD, ADHD, and CU traits are highly comorbid. Studies need to generate insights into shared versus unique risk mechanisms, including through the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In this study, we tested whether symptoms of CD, ODD, ADHD, and CU traits were best represented within a bifactor framework, simultaneously modeling shared (i.e., general externalizing problems) and unique (i.e., symptom-specific) variance, or through a four-correlated factor or second-order factor model. Participants (N = 11,878, age, M = 9 years) were from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study. We used questionnaire and functional magnetic resonance imaging data (emotional N-back task) from the baseline assessment. A bifactor model specifying a general externalizing and specific CD, ODD, ADHD, and CU traits factors demonstrated the best fit. The four-correlated and second-order factor models both fit the data well and were retained for analyses. Across models, reduced right amygdala activity to fearful faces was associated with more general externalizing problems and reduced dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity to fearful faces was associated with higher CU traits. ADHD scores were related to greater right nucleus accumbens activation to fearful and happy faces. Results give insights into risk mechanisms underlying comorbidity and heterogeneity within externalizing psychopathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Bifactor model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional defiance, conduct problems, and CU traits Note Model fit: χ2(433)= 4,448.83; CFI=.98; TLI=.98; RMSEA=.03. See Table S5 for individual item-factor loadings. *For the bifactor model one item loaded negatively on the specific ODD factor and was removed (“Disobedient at school”). ADHD=Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Specific Factor; CD=Conduct Disorder Specific Factor; CU=Callous-unemotional traits Specific Factor; ODD= Oppositional-Defiance Disorder Specific Factor.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Differential associations between general externalizing, specific attention-deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional defiance, conduct problems, and CU traits, scores and neural activation in the right and left hemispheres during emotion processing of fearful faces versus neutral faces Note. Standardized estimates from the correlated dependent variable models of brain-behavior associations for fearful versus neutral contrast for both hemispheres. Models controlled for age, sex, income, minoritized status, and task accuracy (Table S9). ACC=anterior cingulate cortex; CU=Callous-unemotional; dlPFC=Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex; G= General Externalizing Factor; NAc=Nucleus Accumbens; OFC=Orbitofrontal Cortex; STG=Superior Temporal Gyrus. *p<.05 following FDR correction
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Differential associations between general externalizing, specific attention-deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional defiance, conduct problems, and CU traits, scores and neural activation in the right and left hemispheres during emotion processing of happy faces versus neutral faces Note. Standardized estimates from the correlated dependent variable models of brain-behavior associations for fearful versus neutral contrast for the both hemispheres. Models controlled for age, sex, income, minoritized status, and task accuracy (Table S9). ACC=anterior cingulate cortex; CU=Callous-unemotional; dlPFC=Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex; G=General Externalizing Factor; NAc=Nucleus Accumbens; OFC=Orbitofrontal Cortex; STG=Superior Temporal Gyrus. *p<.05, **p<.01 following FDR correction

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Achenbach TM, & Rescorla LA (2001). The manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families.
    1. Adolphs R (2002). Neural systems for recognizing emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12(2), 169–177. 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00301-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aggensteiner P-M, Holz NE, Böttinger BW, Baumeister S, Hohmann S, Werhahn JE, Naaijen J, Ilbegi S, Glennon JC, Hoekstra PJ, Dietrich A, Deters RK, Saam MC, Schulze UME, Lythgoe DJ, Sethi A, Craig MC, Mastroianni M, Sagar-Ouriaghli I, … Brandeis D (2022). The effects of callous-unemotional traits and aggression subtypes on amygdala activity in response to negative faces. Psychological Medicine, 52(3), 476–484. 10.1017/S0033291720002111 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ansari Nasab S, Panahi S, Ghassemi F, Jafari S, Rajagopal K, Ghosh D, & Perc M (2022). Functional neuronal networks reveal emotional processing differences in children with ADHD. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 16(1), 91–100. 10.1007/s11571-021-09699-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balia C, Carucci S, Coghill D, & Zuddas A (2018). The pharmacological treatment of aggression in children and adolescents with conduct disorder. Do callous—Unemotional traits modulate the efficacy of medication? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 91, 218–238. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.024 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms