Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6691-6701.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001811.

Evaluation of two-stage hepatectomy using portal vein embolization for colorectal liver metastasis: a retrospective nationwide cohort survey in Japan

Affiliations

Evaluation of two-stage hepatectomy using portal vein embolization for colorectal liver metastasis: a retrospective nationwide cohort survey in Japan

Takayuki Shimizu et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) enables patients to undergo surgery for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), which one-stage hepatectomy cannot remove. Although the outcome of TSH has been reported, there is no original report from Japan. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcome of TSH in Japanese patients with CRLM.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using the nationwide database that included clinical information of 12 519 patients treated with CRLM between 2005 and 2017 in Japan. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. The second outcome measure was progression-free survival. Fisher's exact test, χ 2 test and Mann-Whitney U test were conducted to examine an intergroup difference. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression model. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results: Of the database, 53 patients undergoing TSH using portal vein embolization (PVE) were identified and analyzed. Their morbidity and in-hospital mortality rates at the second hepatectomy were 26.4% and 0.0%. The mean observation period was 21.8 months. The estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rate were 92.5%, 70.8% and 34.7%. Multivariate analyses showed that more than 10 liver nodules significantly increased the mortality risk by 4.2-fold (95% CI 1.224-14.99, P = 0.023). Survival analysis revealed that repeat hepatectomy for disease progression after TSH was superior to chemotherapy in overall survival (mean: 49.6 vs. 18.7, months, P = 0.004).

Conclusion: In the Japanese cohort, TSH was confirmed to be a safety procedure with an acceptable survival outcome. More than 10 liver nodules may be a predictor for unfavorable outcomes of patients with CRLM undergoing TSH. Furthermore, repeat hepatectomy can be a salvage treatment for resectable intrahepatic recurrence after TSH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of the study population. CRLM, colorectal liver metastasis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall and progression-free survival in patients undergoing two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis. (A) Overall survival, (B) progression-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall and progression-free survival in patients undergoing two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) for colorectal liver metastasis according to 10 liver nodules. (A) Overall survival, (B) progression-free survival. (C) Overall survival in patients with initially borderline resectable or unresectable liver disease who have more than 10 nodules according to one-stage hepatectomy (OSH) and two-stage hepatectomy (TSH). (D) Overall survival in patients undergoing TSH for colorectal liver metastasis according to number of treated nodules (TN) at the first hepatectomy (FH).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival in patients undergoing two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis according to (A) extrahepatic disease (EHD) and (B) the degree of residual tumor (R0, R1 and R2 resection).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. van der Geest, Lydia GM, Lam-Boer J, et al. . Nationwide trends in incidence, treatment and survival of colorectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 2015;32:457–465. - PubMed
    1. Biller LH, Schrag D. Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. JAMA 2021;325:669–685. - PubMed
    1. Pawlik TM, Scoggins CR, Zorzi D, et al. . Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2005;241:715–722. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morris EJA, Forman D, Thomas JD, et al. . Surgical management and outcomes of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Br J Surg 2010;97:1110–1118. - PubMed