Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0304159.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304159. eCollection 2024.

Improving quality and patient safety in surgical care through standardisation and harmonisation of perioperative care (SAFEST project): A research protocol for a mixed methods study

Affiliations

Improving quality and patient safety in surgical care through standardisation and harmonisation of perioperative care (SAFEST project): A research protocol for a mixed methods study

Claudia Valli et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: Adverse events in health care affect 8% to 12% of patients admitted to hospitals in the European Union (EU), with surgical adverse events being the most common types reported.

Aim: SAFEST project aims to enhance perioperative care quality and patient safety by establishing and implementing widely supported evidence-based perioperative patient safety practices to reduce surgical adverse events.

Methods: We will conduct a mixed-methods hybrid type III implementation study supporting the development and adoption of evidence-based practices through a Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative (QILC) in co-creation with stakeholders. The project will be conducted in 10 hospitals and related healthcare facilities of 5 European countries. We will assess the level of adherence to the standardised practices, as well as surgical complications incidence, patient-reported outcomes, contextual factors influencing the implementation of the patient safety practices, and sustainability. The project will consist of six components: 1) Development of patient safety standardised practices in perioperative care; 2) Guided self-evaluation of the standardised practices; 3) Identification of priorities and actions plans; 4) Implementation of a QILC strategy; 5) Evaluation of the strategy effectiveness; 6) Patient empowerment for patient safety. Sustainability of the project will be ensured by systematic assessment of sustainability factors and business plans. Towards the end of the project, a call for participation will be launched to allow other hospitals to conduct the self-evaluation of the standardized practices.

Discussion: The SAFEST project will promote patient safety standardized practices in the continuum of care for adult patients undergoing surgery. This project will result in a broad implementation of evidence-based practices for perioperative care, spanning from the care provided before hospital admission to post-operative recovery at home or outpatient facilities. Different implementation challenges will be faced in the application of the evidence-based practices, which will be mitigated by developing context-specific implementation strategies. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and will be available in an online platform.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Perioperative patient journey.
The project will be carried out in 10 hospitals and related healthcare facilities from 5 European Countries (Czech Republic, Estonia, Portugal, Spain, and The Netherlands). At the end of the project, a call for participation will be open to any interested hospitals in the EU and beyond.
Fig 2
Fig 2. IRLM applied within the SAFEST project.
Fig 3
Fig 3. SAFEST overall approach and project’s results.

References

    1. COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on patient safety, including the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=COM(2008... [Accessed 1 July 2022]
    1. Österreich Forschungs Gesundheit und Planungs GmbH and SOGETI. Costs of unsafe care and cost effectiveness of patient safety programmes. Health and Food Safety, European Union 2016. Available: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2017-02/2016_costs_psp_en_0.pdf [Accessed 8 August 2022]
    1. Anderson O, Davis R, Hanna GB, et al.. Surgical adverse events: a systematic review. Am. J. Surg. 2013; 206(2), 253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schwendimann R, Blatter C, Dhaini S., et al.. The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events–a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18, 521. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panagioti M, Khan K, Keers RN, et al.. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 366: l4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms