HIV and adipose tissue: A long history linked to therapeutic classes of antiretrovirals

Abstract

HIV infection has been controlled only since the introduction of triple therapy in 1996, combining, as antiretroviral agents, two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and one protease inhibitor (PI). However, among the NRTIs, the thymidine analogues stavudine and zidovudine led to lipoatrophy, either generalized or associated with visceral fat hypertrophy and buffalo hump. These molecules also increased insulin resistance and the prevalence of diabetes. They were replaced by other NRTIs or non-NRTIs (NNRTIs) that were considered to be free of adipose tissue (AT) toxicity. More recently, the NRTI tenofovir disoproxyfumarate (TDF) and the NNRTI efavirenz have been associated with inhibition of fat gain but not with clear lipoatrophy. Otherwise, the use of PIs led to a phenotype of trunk fat hypertrophy associated with cardiometabolic complications. To avoid their adverse effects, PIs have recently been replaced by a new class of antiretrovirals, the integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), which are well tolerated and effective in controlling HIV. However, this class has been associated with global weight gain, which may be important and concerning for some people living with HIV (PWH). Also, in the NRTI class, TDF has often been replaced by tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) due to bone and renal toxicities, and TAF has been associated with global fat gain. The cardiometabolic consequences of INTIs and TAF are primarily related to the associated weight gain. In the global obesogenic worldwide context, PWH are gaining weight as well in relation to poor health life conditions. Taking in charge obesity uses the same strategies as those used in the general population.

Keywords: Adipose tissue; Antiretrovirals; HIV; Lipoatrophy; Lipohypertrophy; Obesity.