Unveiling critical structural features for effective HDAC8 inhibition: a comprehensive study using quantitative read-across structure-activity relationship (q-RASAR) and pharmacophore modeling
- PMID: 38871969
- DOI: 10.1007/s11030-024-10903-y
Unveiling critical structural features for effective HDAC8 inhibition: a comprehensive study using quantitative read-across structure-activity relationship (q-RASAR) and pharmacophore modeling
Abstract
Histone deacetylases constitute a group of enzymes that participate in several biological processes. Notably, inhibiting HDAC8 has become a therapeutic strategy for various diseases. The current inhibitors for HDAC8 lack selectivity and target multiple HDACs. Consequently, there is a growing recognition of the need for selective HDAC8 inhibitors to enhance the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. In our current study, we have utilized a multi-faceted approach, including Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) combined with Quantitative Read-Across Structure-Activity Relationship (q-RASAR) modeling, pharmacophore mapping, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The developed q-RASAR model has a high statistical significance and predictive ability (Q2F1:0.778, Q2F2:0.775). The contributions of important descriptors are discussed in detail to gain insight into the crucial structural features in HDAC8 inhibition. The best pharmacophore hypothesis exhibits a high regression coefficient (0.969) and a low root mean square deviation (0.944), highlighting the importance of correctly orienting hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA), ring aromatic (RA), and zinc-binding group (ZBG) features in designing potent HDAC8 inhibitors. To confirm the results of q-RASAR and pharmacophore mapping, molecular docking analysis of the five potent compounds (44, 54, 82, 102, and 118) was performed to gain further insights into these structural features crucial for interaction with the HDAC8 enzyme. Lastly, MD simulation studies of the most active compound (54, mapped correctly with the pharmacophore hypothesis) and the least active compound (34, mapped poorly with the pharmacophore hypothesis) were carried out to validate the observations of the studies above. This study not only refines our understanding of essential structural features for HDAC8 inhibition but also provides a robust framework for the rational design of novel selective HDAC8 inhibitors which may offer insights to medicinal chemists and researchers engaged in the development of HDAC8-targeted therapeutics.
Keywords: Descriptor; HDAC8; MD simulation; Molecular docking; Pharmacophore; QSAR.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
An insight into selective and potent inhibition of histone deacetylase 8 through induced-fit docking, pharmacophore modeling and QSAR studies.J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2020 Jan;38(1):48-65. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2019.1567388. Epub 2019 Feb 7. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2020. PMID: 30633630
-
Dynamic structure-based pharmacophore model development: a new and effective addition in the histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) inhibitor discovery.Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(12):9440-62. doi: 10.3390/ijms12129440. Epub 2011 Dec 19. Int J Mol Sci. 2011. PMID: 22272142 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative quantitative structural assessment of benzothiazine-derived HDAC8 inhibitors by predictive ligand-based drug designing approaches.SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2022 Dec;33(12):987-1011. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2022.2155241. Epub 2022 Dec 19. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2022. PMID: 36533308
-
HDAC8 as a target in drug discovery: Function, structure and design.Eur J Med Chem. 2024 Dec 15;280:116972. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2024.116972. Epub 2024 Oct 17. Eur J Med Chem. 2024. PMID: 39427514 Review.
-
Histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) and its inhibitors with selectivity to other isoforms: An overview.Eur J Med Chem. 2019 Feb 15;164:214-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.12.039. Epub 2018 Dec 19. Eur J Med Chem. 2019. PMID: 30594678 Review.
References
-
- Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baylin SB, Ohm JE (2006) Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer—a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction? Nat Rev Cancer 6:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1799 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wang LH, Wu CF, Rajasekaran N, Shin YK (2018) Loss of tumor suppressor gene function in human cancer: an overview. Cell Physiol Biochem 51:2647–2693. https://doi.org/10.1159/000495956 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Handy DE, Castro R, Loscalzo J (2011) Epigenetic modifications: basic mechanisms and role in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 123:2145–2156. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.956839 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Walewska A, Janucik A, Tynecka M, Moniuszko M, Eljaszewicz A (2023) Mesenchymal stem cells under epigenetic control—the role of epigenetic machinery in fate decision and functional properties. Cell Death Dis 14:720. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-06239-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous