Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 13;16(1):31.
doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09542-z.

Developmental associations between cognition and adaptive behavior in intellectual and developmental disability

Affiliations

Developmental associations between cognition and adaptive behavior in intellectual and developmental disability

Andrew Dakopolos et al. J Neurodev Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) are associated with both cognitive challenges and difficulties in conceptual, social, and practical areas of living, commonly referred to as adaptive behavior (DSM-5). Although cross-sectional associations between intelligence or cognition and adaptive behavior have been reported in IDD populations, no study to date has examined whether developmental changes in cognition contribute to or track with changes in adaptive behavior. The present study sought to examine associations of longitudinal developmental change in domains of cognition (NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, NIHTB-CB) and adaptive behavior domains (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-3; VABS-3) including Socialization, Communication, and Daily Living Skills (DLS) over a two year period in a large sample of children, adolescents and young adults with IDD.

Methods: Three groups were recruited, including those with fragile X syndrome, Down syndrome, and other/idiopathic intellectual disability. Eligible participants (n = 263) included those who were between 6 and 26 years (mage = 15.52, sd = 5.17) at Visit 1, and who had a diagnosis of, or suspected intellectual disability (ID), including borderline ID, with a mental age of at least 3.0 years. Participants were given cognitive and adaptive behavior assessments at two time points over a two year period (m = 2.45 years, range = 1.27 to 5.56 years). In order to examine the association of developmental change between cognitive and adaptive behavior domains, bivariate latent change score (BLCS) models were fit to compare change in the three cognitive domains measured by the NIHTB-CB (Fluid Cognition, Crystallized Cognition, Total Cognition) and the three adaptive behavior domains measured by the VABS-3 (Communication, DLS, and Socialization).

Results: Over a two year period, change in cognition (both Crystallized and Total Composites) was significantly and positively associated with change in daily living skills. Also, baseline cognition level predicted growth in adaptive behavior, however baseline adaptive behavior did not predict growth in cognition in any model.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that developmental changes in cognition and adaptive behavior are associated in children and young adults with IDD, indicating the potential for cross-domain effects of intervention. Notably, improvements in DLS emerged as a primary area of adaptive behavior that positively related to improvements in cognition. This work provides evidence for the clinical, "real life" meaningfulness of changes in cognition detected by the NIHTB-CB in IDD, and provides empirical support for the NIHTB-CB as a fit-for-purpose performance-based outcome measure for this population.

Keywords: Adaptive behavior; Cognition; Down syndrome; Fragile X syndrome; Intellectual and developmental disability; Latent change; Longitudinal studies; NIH Toolbox; Structural equation modeling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AJK, JK, AD, EC, ES, D. Harvey and KR: no relevant disclosures; EBK has received funding from the following, all of which are directed to Rush University Medical Center in support of rare disease programs, and she receives no personal funds and has no relevant financial interest in any of the commercial entities listed: Acadia, Alcobra, Anavex, Biogen, BioMarin, Cydan, Fulcrum, GeneTx, GW, Ionis, Lumos, Marinus, Neuren, Neurotrope, Novartis, Orphazyme, Ovid, Roche, Seaside Therapeutics, Tetra, Ultragenyx, Yamo, and Zynerba to consult on trial design and development strategies and/or to conduct clinical studies in FXS or other NNDs or neurodegenerative disorders; Vtesse/Sucampo/Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals to conduct clinical trials in Nieman Pick; and Asuragen Inc to develop testing standards for FMR1 testing; D. Hessl has received funding from the following, all of which are directed to the UC Davis, in support of fragile X treatment programs, and he receives no personal funds and has no relevant financial interest in any of the commercial entities listed: Autifony, Ovid, Tetra/Shionogi, Healx, and Zynerba pharmaceutical companies to consult on outcome measures and clinical trial design. D. Hessl and EBK are members of the Clinical Trials Committee of the National Fragile X Foundation.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Structural equation model diagram of representative Model B showing association between latent constructs of total cognition composite (COG; NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery) and adaptive behavior (AB; Vineland-3 Daily Living Skills [DLS]) at Visits 1 and 2 and latent change of these constructs across 2 years of development in youth with IDD. Manifest variables omitted for visual clarity
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Linear association (with SE shaded) between latent change scores for VABS-3 Daily Living Skills (y-axis) and NIHTB-CB Cognition Composite (x-axis) for Model B

Update of

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC. 2013. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.
    1. Sparrow SS, Cicchetti DV, Saulnier CA. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (VinelandTM-3) Comprehensive Interview Form Report. 2016.
    1. Bertollo JR, Yerys BE. More than IQ: Executive function explains adaptive behavior above and beyond nonverbal IQ in youth with autism and lower IQ. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019;124:191–205. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-124.3.191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanne SM, et al. The role of adaptive behavior in autism spectrum disorders: Implications for functional outcome. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011;41:1007–1018. doi: 10.1007/s10803-010-1126-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartley SL et al. Exploring the adult life of men and women with fragile X syndrome: Results from a national survey. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2011. 116 16–35 Preprint at 10.1352/1944-7558-116.1.16. - PMC - PubMed