Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
- PMID: 38872304
- PMCID: PMC11179492
- DOI: 10.1177/15579883241260511
Comparison of Childless and Partnerless Vasectomy Rates Before and After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Abstract
The Supreme Court ruling Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (June 2022) overturned federal protection of abortion rights, resulting in significant impact on both male and female reproductive rights and health care delivery. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent vasectomy at a single academic institution between June 2021 and June 2023. Our objective was to compare the rates of childless and partnerless vasectomies 1 year before and after this ruling, as these men may be more susceptible to postprocedural regret. Of total, 631 men (median age = 39 years, range = 20-70) underwent vasectomy consultation. Total vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 304 (48%) versus 327 (52%). Total childless and partnerless vasectomies pre- and post-Dobbs were 44 (42%) versus 61 (58%) and 43 (46%) versus 50 (54%). Vasectomy completion rate was slightly increased post-Dobbs (90% vs. 88%; p = .240). The post-Dobbs cohort had significantly less children (1.8 vs. 2.0; p = .031). Men in the post-Dobbs era were significantly more likely to be commercially insured (72% vs. 64%) and less likely to be uninsured (1% vs. 6%; p = .002). Men who underwent childless vasectomy were significantly more likely to be younger (36.4 vs. 39.8 years; p < .001). There was a significantly greater proportion of Hispanic and Black men in the partnerless cohort compared to the cohort with partners (24% vs. 19% and 9% vs. 2%; p = .002). In conclusion, patients should be counseled on the permanent nature of this procedure, underscoring need for effective and reversible male contraception.
Keywords: reproductive health; reproductive legislation; vasectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr V.N. has no disclosures. Dr M.K.L. has no disclosures. Dr M.C.L. has no disclosures. Dr. D.P.P. has the following to disclose: Apta Pharma—equity interest; Endo Pharmaceuticals—advisor; Hera Fertility—advisor and consultant. Dr T.-C.H. has the following to disclose: Boston Scientific—advisor and consultant and Endo Pharmaceuticals—advisor and consultant.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Rising vasectomy volume following reversal of federal protections for abortion rights in the United States.Int J Impot Res. 2024 May;36(3):265-268. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00672-x. Epub 2023 Feb 14. Int J Impot Res. 2024. PMID: 36788351 Free PMC article.
-
Short-Term Changes in Vasectomy Consults and Procedures Following Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization.Urol Pract. 2024 May;11(3):517-525. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000528. Epub 2024 Feb 5. Urol Pract. 2024. PMID: 38315830
-
Changes in Vasectomy Practice Patterns After Dobbs: A Multi-Institutional Study.Urol Pract. 2025 Jul;12(4):426-432. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000810. Epub 2025 Mar 11. Urol Pract. 2025. PMID: 40067911
-
A review of the changing landscape of vasectomy trends in the United States in the post-dobbs era.Int J Impot Res. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01053-2. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 40185908 Review.
-
Bridging the Knowledge Gap: A Toolkit on Reproductive Rights for Pediatric Surgeons in the Post-Dobbs Era.J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Jul;59(7):1374-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.029. Epub 2024 Mar 16. J Pediatr Surg. 2024. PMID: 38589273 Review.
Cited by
-
Patient-Reported Influence of Sociopolitical Issues on Post-Dobbs Vasectomy Decisions.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454430. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54430. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 39792387 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of social media on patient and public perception of vasectomy: a narrative review.Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01114-6. Online ahead of print. Int J Impot Res. 2025. PMID: 40562868 Review.
References
-
- Choi A., Cole D. (2024, May). See where abortions are banned and legal—And where it’s still in limbo. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/us/abortion-access-restrictions-bans-us-dg/index.html
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical