Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 30:4:1309692.
doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1309692. eCollection 2024.

Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review

Aurélia Faust  1 , Nicolas Ray  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Consequences of geographical accessibility to post-exposure treatment for rabies and snakebite in Africa: a mini review

Aurélia Faust et al. Front Health Serv. .

Abstract

Introduction: Rabies and snakebite envenoming are two zoonotic neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) transmitted to humans by animal bites, causing each year around 179,000 deaths and are most prevalent in Asia and Africa. Improving geographical accessibility to treatment is crucial in reducing the time from bite to treatment. This mini review aims to identify and synthesize recent studies on the consequences of distance and travel time on the victims of these diseases in African countries, in order to discuss potential joint approaches for health system strengthening targeting both diseases.

Methods: A literature review was conducted separately for each disease using Pubmed, Google Scholar, and snowball searching. Eligible studies, published between 2017 and 2022, had to discuss any aspect linked to geographical accessibility to treatments for either disease in Africa.

Results: Twenty-two articles (8 on snakebite and 14 on rabies) were eligible for data extraction. No study targeted both diseases. Identified consequences of low accessibility to treatment were classified into 6 categories: (1) Delay to treatment; (2) Outcome; (3) Financial impacts; (4) Under-reporting; (5) Compliance to treatment, and (6) Visits to traditional healers.

Discussion and conclusion: Geographical access to treatment significantly influences the burden of rabies and snakebite in Africa. In line with WHO's call for integrating approaches among NTDs, there are opportunities to model disease hotspots, assess population coverage, and optimize geographic access to care for both diseases, possibly jointly. This could enhance the management of these NTDs and contribute to achieving the global snakebite and rabies roadmaps by 2030.

Keywords: Africa; accessibility; neglected tropical disease; rabies; snakebite.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Article selection process for rabies and snakebite.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Ending the Neglect to Attain the Sustainable Development Goals: A Road Map for Neglected Tropical Diseases 2021–2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; (2020). p. 196.
    1. World Health Organization. Rabies. Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/rabies (accessed December 27, 2023).
    1. Dodet B, Tejiokem MC, Aguemon A-R, Bourhy H. Human rabies deaths in Africa: breaking the cycle of indifference. Int Health. (2015) 7:4–6. 10.1093/inthealth/ihu071 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warrell MJ, Warrell DA. Rabies and other lyssavirus diseases. Lancet. (2004) 363:959–69. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15792-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banyard AC, Tordo N. Rabies pathogenesis and immunology. Rev Sci Tech. (2018) 37:323–30. 10.20506/rst.37.2.2805 - DOI - PubMed