Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 22:4:115.
doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13418.1. eCollection 2021.

A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy

Caroline O'Connor  1   2 , Sara Leitao  2   3 , Keelin O'Donoghue  1   2
Affiliations

A protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy

Caroline O'Connor et al. HRB Open Res. .

Abstract

Overview: The protocol outlines the process designed to systematically review clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), addressing the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancies. Background: CPGs are statements that include recommendations intended to optimise patient care, that are informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and harms of alternative care options. CPGs are typically created by scientific institutes, organisations and professional societies, and high-quality CPGs are fundamental to improve patient outcomes, standardise clinical practice and improve the quality of care. While CPGs are designed to improve the quality of care, to achieve this, the identification and appraisal of current international CPGs is required. Because twin pregnancies are identified as high-risk pregnancies, a systematic review of the CPGs in this field is a useful first step for establishing the required high level of care. Aim: The aim of the systematic review is to identify, appraise and examine published CPGs for the antenatal management of DCDA twin pregnancies, within high-income countries. Methods: We will identify published CPGs addressing any aspect of antenatal management of care in DCDA twin pregnancies, appraise the quality of the identified CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation version 2 (AGREE II) the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation - Recommendations excellence (AGREE-REX) instruments and examining the recommendations from the identified CPGs. Ultimately, this protocol aspires to clearly define the process for a reproducible systematic review of CPGs within a high-income country, addressing any aspect of antenatal management of DCDA twin pregnancies. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021248586 (24/06/2021).

Keywords: Dichorionic diamniotic; antenatal management.; clinical practice guidelines; multiple pregnancy; protocol; twin pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Multiple pregnancy: twin and triplet pregnancies Quality Standard: (QS46). 2019. Reference Source
    1. Lewi L: Monochorionic diamniotic twins: What do I tell the prospective parents? Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(7):766–75. 10.1002/pd.5705 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khalil A, O’Brien P: Challenges of twin pregnancy. Br J Midwifery. 2007;15(5):266–72.
    1. Bortolus R, Parazzini F, Chatenoud L, et al. : The epidemiology of multiple births. Human Reproduction Update. 1999;5(2):179–87. 10.1093/humupd/5.2.179 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khalil A, Liu B: Controversies in the management of twin pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2021;57(6):888–902. 10.1002/uog.22181 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources