Outcomes and considerations for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the setting of multiple and large renal stones (>15 mm) in children: Findings from multicentre and real-world setting
- PMID: 38873356
- PMCID: PMC11168767
- DOI: 10.1002/bco2.357
Outcomes and considerations for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the setting of multiple and large renal stones (>15 mm) in children: Findings from multicentre and real-world setting
Erratum in
-
Erratum.BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 30;5(12):1324-1329. doi: 10.1002/bco2.482. eCollection 2024 Dec. BJUI Compass. 2024. PMID: 39744071 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of retrograde intra renal surgery (RIRS) in the setting of large or multiple stones in children (<18 years).
Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis was performed of paediatric RIRS cases at nine centres worldwide over a 6-year period. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 had a single stone <15 mm. Group 2 had either multiple stones, maximum stone diameter of >15 mm, or both. Outcomes included stone free rate (SFR) and complications within 30 days.
Results: In total, 344 patients were included with 197 and 147 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Ureteric access sheaths were more frequently used in Group 2 (39.5% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.021). The operation time was significantly longer in Group 2 (p < 0.001). SFR after a single procedure was 84.7% in Group 1 and 63.7% in Group 2. Overall complication rates in Groups 1 and 2 were 7.6% and 33.3%, respectively. The most frequently reported complication in both groups was post-operative fever (4.4% vs. 14%, p = 0.004). The rate of Clavien I/II complications in groups 1 and 2 was 6% and 25.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). The rate of Clavien ≥ III complications in groups 1 and 2 was 1.6% and 8.1%, respectively (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, total operation time, stone size and multiplicity were significant predictors of residual fragments.
Conclusions: RIRS can be performed in paediatric cases with large and multiple stone burdens, but the complication rate is significantly higher when compared to smaller stones.
Keywords: paediatric; renal stone; retrograde intrarenal surgery; ureteroscopy; urolithiasis.
© 2024 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have none to declare.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Factors Responsible for Stone-Free Status After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.Cureus. 2024 Jul 1;16(7):e63627. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63627. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38957512 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.Actas Urol Esp. 2015 May;39(4):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Nov 28. Actas Urol Esp. 2015. PMID: 25435403 Clinical Trial. English, Spanish.
-
Outcomes and lessons learnt from practice of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in a paediatric setting of various age groups: a global study across 8 centres.World J Urol. 2022 May;40(5):1223-1229. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03950-3. Epub 2022 Feb 7. World J Urol. 2022. PMID: 35129624
-
The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists.Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Dec;73(6):711-723. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04388-3. Epub 2021 Jun 22. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021. PMID: 34156200
-
The Evolving Role of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Treatment of Urolithiasis.Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Feb;3(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 5. Eur Urol Focus. 2017. PMID: 28720366 Review.
Cited by
-
Current utility, instruments, and future directions for intra-renal pressure management during ureteroscopy: scoping review by global research in intra-renal pressure collaborative group initiative.Ther Adv Urol. 2025 Jan 31;17:17562872251314809. doi: 10.1177/17562872251314809. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2025. PMID: 39896048 Free PMC article.
-
Erratum.BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 30;5(12):1324-1329. doi: 10.1002/bco2.482. eCollection 2024 Dec. BJUI Compass. 2024. PMID: 39744071 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík A, Somani B, Thomas K, Gambaro G, et al. (Eds). EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. In: EAU Guidelines Edn Presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam; 2022.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources