Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;51(9):6317-6331.
doi: 10.1002/mp.17246. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

Skin dose investigations on a 0.5 T parallel rotating biplanar linac-MR using Monte Carlo simulations and measurements

Patricia A K Oliver  1   2   3 , Eugene Yip  1   2 , Shima Y Tari  1   2 , Keith Wachowicz  1   2 , Michael Reynolds  1 , Ben Burke  1   2 , Brad Warkentin  1   2 , B Gino Fallone  1   2   4
Affiliations

Skin dose investigations on a 0.5 T parallel rotating biplanar linac-MR using Monte Carlo simulations and measurements

Patricia A K Oliver et al. Med Phys. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The Alberta rotating biplanar linac-MR has a 0.5 T magnetic field parallel to the beamline. When developing a new linac-MR system, interactions of charged particles with the magnetic field necessitate careful consideration of skin dose and tissue interface effects.

Purpose: To investigate the effect of the magnetic field on skin dose using measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations.

Methods: We develop an MC model of our linac-MR, which we validate by comparison with ion chamber measurements in a water tank. Additionally, MC simulation results are compared with radiochromic film surface dose measurements on solid water. Variations in surface dose as a function of field size are measured using a parallel plate ion chamber in solid water. Using an anthropomorphic computational phantom with a 2 mm-thick skin layer, we investigate dose distributions resulting from three beam arrangements. Magnetic field on and off scenarios are considered for all measurements and simulations.

Results: For a 20 × 20 cm2 field size, D 0.2 c c ${D_{0.2cc}}$ (the minimum dose to the hottest contiguous 0.2 cc volume) for the top 2 mm of a simple water phantom is 72% when the magnetic field is on, compared to 34% with magnetic field off (values are normalized to the central axis dose maximum). Parallel plate ion chamber measurements demonstrate that the relative increase in surface dose due to the magnetic field decreases with increasing field size. For the anthropomorphic phantom, D ∼ 0.2 c c ${D_{ \sim 0.2cc}}$ (minimum skin dose in the hottest 1 × 1 × 1 cm3 cube) shows relative increases of 20%-28% when the magnetic field is on compared to when it is off. With magnetic field off, skin D ∼ 0.2 c c ${D_{ \sim 0.2cc}}$ is 71%, 56%, and 21% for medial-lateral tangents, anterior-posterior beams, and a five-field arrangement, respectively. For magnetic field on, the corresponding skin D ∼ 0.2 c c ${D_{ \sim 0.2cc}}$ values are 91%, 67%, and 25%.

Conclusions: Using a validated MC model of our linac-MR, surface doses are calculated in various scenarios. MC-calculated skin dose varies depending on field sizes, obliquity, and the number of beams. In general, the parallel linac-MR arrangement results in skin dose enhancement due to charged particles spiraling along magnetic field lines, which impedes lateral motion away from the central axis. Nonetheless, considering the results presented herein, treatment plans can be designed to minimize skin dose by, for example, avoiding oblique beams and using a larger number of fields.

Keywords: MR‐guided radiotherapy; Monte Carlo; skin dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Raaijmakers AJE, Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJW. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue‐air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(7):1363‐1376.
    1. van Heijst TCF, den Hartogh MD, Lagendijk JW, Desiree van den Bongard HJG, van Asselen B. MR‐guided breast radiotherapy: feasibility and magnetic‐field impact on skin dose. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(17):5917‐5930.
    1. Wang MH, Kim A, Ruschin M, et al. Comparison of Prospectively Generated Glioma Treatment Plans Clinically Delivered on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)‐Linear Accelerator (MR‐Linac) Versus Conventional Linac: predicted and Measured Skin Dose. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022;21:1‐10.
    1. Nachbar M, Monnich D, Boeke S, et al. Partial breast irradiation with the 1.5 T MR‐Linac: first patient treatment and analysis of electron return and stream effects. Radiother Oncol. 2020;145:30‐35.
    1. Shortall J, Vasquez Osorio E, Chuter R, et al. Assessing localized dosimetric effects due to unplanned gas cavities during pelvic MR‐guided radiotherapy using Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys. 2019;46(12):5807‐5815.

LinkOut - more resources