Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;64(6):647-650.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.13846. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

Examining service delivery patterns before and after implementation of a direct-to-patient telehealth service providing medication abortion in Australia

Jane W Seymour  1 , Catriona Melville  2 , Daniel Grossman  3 , Terri-Ann Thompson  4
Affiliations

Examining service delivery patterns before and after implementation of a direct-to-patient telehealth service providing medication abortion in Australia

Jane W Seymour et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

In August 2016, MSI Australia (MSIA) brought to scale a direct-to-patient telehealth medication abortion service. We used MSIA's patient management systems from January 2015 to December 2018 to assess changes in the proportion of abortion patients obtaining care after 13 weeks' gestation, proportion of abortion patients obtaining medication abortion versus procedural abortion and proportion of abortion patients from regional and remote versus metropolitan areas. The proportions of abortion patients obtaining care before 13 weeks' gestational duration and those from regional and remote residents did not change between the pre- and post-periods. We observed an increase in medication abortion use that was greater among those in regional and remote areas than those in metropolitan areas.

Keywords: delivery of healthcare; health services research; induced abortion; reproductive health service; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Doran FM, Hornibrook J. Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia. Rural Remote Health 2016; 16(1): 3538. - PubMed
    1. LaRoche KJ, Wynn LL, Foster AM. “We've got rights and yet we don't have access”: Exploring patient experiences accessing medication abortion in Australia. Contraception 2020; 101(4): 256–260. 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seymour JW, Melville C, Thompson TA, Grossman D. Effectiveness and safety of a direct‐to‐patient telehealth service providing medication abortion targeted at rural and remote populations: Cross‐sectional findings from Marie stopes Australia. Contraception 2022; 115: 67–68. 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.06.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson TA, Seymour JW, Melville C et al. An observational study of patient experiences with a direct‐to‐patient telehealth abortion model in Australia. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2022; 48(2): 103–109. 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201259. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerestes C, Delafield R, Elia J et al. “It was close enough, but it wasn't close enough”: A qualitative exploration of the impact of direct‐to‐patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care. Contraception 2021; 104(1): 67–72. 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.028. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding