Low back pain self-management mobile applications: a systematic review on digital platforms
- PMID: 38875500
- PMCID: PMC11210980
- DOI: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0326en
Low back pain self-management mobile applications: a systematic review on digital platforms
Abstract
Objective: To identify and analyze the features and quality of self-management support of mobile applications available in Brazil for chronic low back pain in adults.
Method: A systematic review on the Apple Store® and Google Play® digital platforms. The Self-Management Support Assessment Tool scale was used to assess self-management support and the Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score scale was used to assess functionality.
Results: Seventeen applications were selected, which included around seven self-management skills. The applications that met the majority of self-management support skills were Pathways, Branch, Pancea, Pain Navigator, and Curable. The Curable, Branch and MoovButh applications had the highest scores, with ten features on the functionality scale.
Conclusion: Some applications have the potential to complement in-person treatment in terms of validity, acceptability and clinical usefulness in pain management. However, barriers such as lack of partnership between healthcare providers and patients, limited evidence-based content, social support, cultural relevance, cost, language, security and privacy can limit their sustained use. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022382686.
Objetivo:: Identificar e analisar os recursos e a qualidade do suporte de autogerenciamento dos aplicativos móveis disponíveis no Brasil para dor lombar crônica em adultos.
Método:: Revisão sistemática nas plataformas digitais Apple Store ® e Google Play ®. Utilizaram-se a escala Self-Management Support Assessment Tool para avaliar o suporte ao autogerenciamento e a escala Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score para avaliar a funcionalidade.
Resultados:: Foram selecionados 17 aplicativos, que incluíram cerca de sete habilidades de autogerenciamento. Os aplicativos que atendiam à maioria das habilidades de suporte ao autogerenciamento foram Pathways, Branch, Pancea, Pain Navigator e Curable. Os aplicativos Curable, Branch e MoovButh apresentaram as maiores pontuações, com dez funcionalidades na escala de funcionalidade.
Conclusão:: Alguns aplicativos têm potencial para complementar o tratamento presencial em termos de validade, aceitabilidade e utilidade clínica no manejo da dor. No entanto, barreiras como falta de parceria entre profissionais de saúde e pacientes, conteúdo limitado baseado em evidências, apoio social, relevância cultural, custo, idioma, segurança e privacidade podem limitar o seu uso sustentado. Registro PROSPERO: CRD42022382686.
Objetivo:: Identificar y analizar las características y la calidad del soporte de autogestión de aplicaciones móviles disponibles en Brasil para el dolor lumbar crónico en adultos.
Método:: Revisión sistemática en las plataformas digitales Apple Store ® y Google Play ® . Se utilizó la escala Self-Management Support Assessment Tool para evaluar el apoyo a la autogestión y la escala Institute for Healthcare Informatics Functionality Score para evaluar la funcionalidad.
Resultados:: Se seleccionaron 17 aplicaciones, que incluían alrededor de siete habilidades de autogestión. Las aplicaciones que cumplieron con la mayoría de las habilidades de apoyo a la autogestión fueron Pathways, Branch, Pancea, Pain Navigator y Curable. Las aplicaciones Curable, Branch y MoovButh obtuvieron las puntuaciones más altas, con diez características en la escala de funcionalidad.
Conclusión:: Algunas aplicaciones tienen potencial para complementar el tratamiento presencial en términos de validez, aceptabilidad y utilidad clínica en el manejo del dolor. Sin embargo, barreras como la falta de asociación entre los profesionales de la salud y los pacientes, el contenido limitado basado en evidencia, el apoyo social, la relevancia cultural, el costo, el idioma, la seguridad y la privacidad pueden limitar su uso sostenido. Registro PROSPERO: CRD42022382686.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of Self-Management Support Functions in Apps for People With Persistent Pain: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 12;7(2):e13080. doi: 10.2196/13080. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30747715 Free PMC article.
-
Availability, content and quality of commercially available smartphone applications for the self-management of low back pain: a systematic assessment.Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(24):7600-7609. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1979664. Epub 2021 Oct 6. Disabil Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 34612133
-
mHealth Apps for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Feb 1;12:e53262. doi: 10.2196/53262. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024. PMID: 38300700 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of the Most Suitable Mobile Apps to Support Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Diet Self-Management: Systematic Search of App Stores and Content Analysis.Nutrients. 2023 Aug 6;15(15):3476. doi: 10.3390/nu15153476. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37571413 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Availability, Quality, and Evidence-Based Content of mHealth Apps for the Treatment of Nonspecific Low Back Pain in the German Language: Systematic Assessment.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 13;11:e47502. doi: 10.2196/47502. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023. PMID: 37703072 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A scoping review of the reporting quality of reviews of commercially and publicly available mobile health apps.JAMIA Open. 2025 Jan 13;8(1):ooae159. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae159. eCollection 2025 Feb. JAMIA Open. 2025. PMID: 39810923 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous