Acoustic fish community in the Madeira Archipelago (North Atlantic Ocean): Characterization of sound diversity and daily patterns
- PMID: 38875901
- DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106600
Acoustic fish community in the Madeira Archipelago (North Atlantic Ocean): Characterization of sound diversity and daily patterns
Abstract
Marine ecosystems are increasingly subjected to anthropogenic pressures, which demands urgent monitoring plans. Understanding soundscapes can offer unique insights into the ocean status providing important information and revealing different sounds and their sources. Fishes can be prominent soundscape contributors, making passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) a potential tool to detect the presence of vocal fish species and to monitor changes in biodiversity. The major goal of this research was to provide a first reference of the marine soundscapes of the Madeira Archipelago focusing on fish sounds, as a basis for a long-term PAM program. Based on the literature, 102 potentially vocal and 35 vocal fish species were identified. Additionally 43 putative fish sound types were detected in audio recordings from two marine protected areas (MPAs) in the Archipelago: the Garajau MPA and the Desertas MPA. The Garajau MPA exhibited higher fish vocal activity, a greater variety of putative fish sound types and higher fish sound diversity. Lower abundance of sounds was found at night at both MPAs. Acoustic activity revealed a clear distinction between diurnal and nocturnal fish groups and demonstrated daily patterns of fish sound activity, suggesting temporal and spectral partitioning of the acoustic space. Pomacentridae species were proposed as candidates for some of the dominant sound types detected during the day, while scorpionfishes (Scorpaena spp.) were proposed as sources for some of the dominant nocturnal fish sounds. This study provides an important baseline about this community acoustic behaviour and is a valuable steppingstone for future non-invasive and cost-effective monitoring programs in Madeira.
Keywords: Acoustic communication; Acoustic niche hypothesis; Fish sounds; Marine protected area; Passive acoustic monitoring; Unidentified fish sounds.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Sensing ecosystem dynamics via audio source separation: A case study of marine soundscapes off northeastern Taiwan.PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Feb 18;17(2):e1008698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008698. eCollection 2021 Feb. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021. PMID: 33600436 Free PMC article.
-
Marine soundscape and fish biophony of a Mediterranean marine protected area.PeerJ. 2021 Dec 15;9:e12551. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12551. eCollection 2021. PeerJ. 2021. PMID: 35003918 Free PMC article.
-
Soundscape analysis can be an effective tool in assessing seagrass restoration early success.Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 8;14(1):20910. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71975-2. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39245725 Free PMC article.
-
An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes.J Fish Biol. 2019 May;94(5):692-713. doi: 10.1111/jfb.13948. Epub 2019 Apr 5. J Fish Biol. 2019. PMID: 30864159 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Actively soniferous tropical reef fishes are diverse, vulnerable, and valuable.J Fish Biol. 2025 Apr;106(4):990-995. doi: 10.1111/jfb.16030. Epub 2024 Dec 16. J Fish Biol. 2025. PMID: 39681114 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous