The time of equipoise on the use of biological DMARDs in for inflammatory arthritis during pregnancy is finally over: a reappraisal of evidence to optimise pregnancy management
- PMID: 38876126
- DOI: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00097-3
The time of equipoise on the use of biological DMARDs in for inflammatory arthritis during pregnancy is finally over: a reappraisal of evidence to optimise pregnancy management
Abstract
Active inflammatory arthritis in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Treatment of active inflammation and maintenance of low disease activity with medication reduces these risks. Therapeutic decisions on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in pregnancy are complicated by safety concerns, which have led to inappropriate withdrawal of treatment and consequential harm to mother and fetus. Studies of inflammatory arthritis in pregnancy have consistently shown minimal safety concerns with the use of biological DMARDs and an increased risk of disease flare with discontinuation of biological DMARDs. It is our opinion that during pregnancy, the benefits of disease control with biological DMARDs, when required in addition to conventional synthetic DMARDs, outweigh the risks. In this Series paper, we review the reasons for reconsideration of equipoise and propose an agenda for future research to optimise the use of biological DMARDs in inflammatory arthritis during pregnancy.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests IG has received grants from Union Chimique Belge (UCB), honoraria from MGP as a coauthor on an educational review article in 2020, and speaker fees from UCB, and has participated in advisory boards for UCB. IT has received speaker fees from UCB. CN-P has received speaker fees from UCB and participated in advisory boards for UCB. CT has received honoraria to provide an online lecture in a related area in 2022 and to be coauthor on an educational review article in 2020 (from MGP), and has acted as an expert witness for obstetric cases in the UK. SD has received speaker and consulting fees from UCB. NF has received consulting fees from ALK, Sanofi Aventis, Gideon Richter, Abbot, Galderma, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Vertex, Thea, Novo Nordisk, Aimmune, and Ipsen; speaker fees from Abbott Singapore; and has participated in advisory boards for Orion. RJEMD has received grants paid to his department from the Dutch Arthritis Association, ZonMw, UCB, and Galapagos; consulting fees from Galapagos and UCB; and speaker fees from UCB, Roche, AbbVie, Genzyme, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly; and has participated in advisory boards for Galapagos and UCB. MEBC has received grants and consulting fees from GSK and UCB and has participated in advisory boards for MotherToBaby. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical