Achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing gastric resections in a low incidence, high-volume Australian Upper GI unit
- PMID: 38876291
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.06.005
Achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing gastric resections in a low incidence, high-volume Australian Upper GI unit
Abstract
Background: Textbook outcome (TBO) has been proposed as a composite measure of quality in esophagogastric surgery, and achieving a TBO has been associated with improved overall survival (OS). The Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit group determined their TBO rate for gastrectomy to be 32.1%, using 10 parameters. Our study aimed to assess the TBO rate in patients who had a gastrectomy for cancer in an Australian Upper GI unit, allowing for comparisons with international specialist centers.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who had a gastrectomy for cancer performed by the surgeons in a single Australian center between 2013 and 2018. Postoperative complications were analyzed using Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥2 and CD ≥3 definitions. Baseline factors and their association with TBO were analyzed using multivariable logistical regression. The association between TBO and survival rates was determined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Results: In 136 patients, 84 (62%) achieved a TBO when complications were graded as CD ≥2. Greatest negative impact on TBO was the complication rate, lymph node yield, and length of stay. Patients more likely to achieve a TBO were younger, with an increased body mass index and absence of underlying respiratory disease. A nonsignificant trend toward improved OS was seen when TBO was achieved.
Conclusion: Our TBO rate compares favorably with published data from high-volume centers. Assessment of a unit's TBO may provide a stronger evaluation of quality when assessing where complex surgery should be performed within Australia.
Keywords: Cancer surgery; Gastrectomy; Quality performance indicators; Textbook outcome.
Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Textbook outcomes for oesophagectomy: A valid composite measure assessment tool for surgical performance in a specialist unit.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;49(9):106897. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.233. Epub 2023 Mar 30. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37032271
-
Surgery by a minimally invasive approach is associated with improved textbook outcomes in oesophageal and gastric cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2332-2339. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.240. Epub 2021 Mar 17. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33766456
-
Gastrectomy case volume and textbook outcome: an analysis of the Population Registry of Esophageal and Stomach Tumours of Ontario (PRESTO).Gastric Cancer. 2020 May;23(3):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s10120-019-01015-w. Epub 2019 Nov 4. Gastric Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31686260
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Cancer: A Western Center Cohort Study.J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:372-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.006. Epub 2019 Oct 31. J Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 31679797
-
Impact of Textbook Oncologic Outcome Attainment on Survival After Gastrectomy: A Review of the National Cancer Database.Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8239-8248. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12388-1. Epub 2022 Aug 16. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35974232 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical