Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;44(9):1033-1042.
doi: 10.1002/pd.6621. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

Perspectives of pregnant women on broadening the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing from screening for foetal aneuploidies to prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: A qualitative study

Ellis C Becking  1 , Lidewij Henneman  2   3 , Neeltje M T H Crombag  1 , Janneke Bertorotta  1 , Ylana Rijsbergen  1 , Caroline J Bax  3   4 , Elsbeth van Vliet-Lachotzki  5 , Peter G Scheffer  1 , Mireille N Bekker  1
Affiliations

Perspectives of pregnant women on broadening the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing from screening for foetal aneuploidies to prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: A qualitative study

Ellis C Becking et al. Prenat Diagn. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the perspectives of pregnant women on broadening the scope of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) from screening for foetal aneuploidies to prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: Four online focus groups (n = 23 participants) and 14 individual semi-structured interviews were conducted. Participants included pregnant women with and without a history of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Results: Both women at low and high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes had a positive attitude towards using NIPT to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. Perceived benefits included the possibility to potentially improve maternal and foetal outcomes by taking risk-reducing measures and/or intensified monitoring during pregnancy and the ability to mentally prepare for the potential adverse outcome. Perceived concerns included anxiety and stress caused by a high-risk test result, a false sense of control over pregnancy, and potential false reassurance. Additionally, women reasoned that broadening the scope of NIPT could increase the complexity of prenatal screening and raised concerns on the combined screening aims in one test (prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes to improve foetal and maternal health vs. screening for foetal aneuploidies to increase reproductive autonomy). On a societal level, considerations on the risk of medicalising pregnancy and overall pressure to opt for NIPT were mentioned.

Conclusion: In general, pregnant women have a positive attitude towards broadening the scope of NIPT to the prediction of pregnancy outcomes, although some concerns are acknowledged.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Dennis LYM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997;350(9076):485‐487. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140‐6736(97)02174‐0
    1. Bianchi DW, Chiu RWK. Sequencing of circulating cell‐free DNA during pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(5):464‐473. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1705345
    1. Chandrasekharan S, Minear MA, Hung A, Allyse M. Noninvasive prenatal testing goes global. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(231):231fs15. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008704
    1. Phillips KA, Douglas MP, Wordsworth S, Buchanan J, Marshall DA. Availability and funding of clinical genomic sequencing globally. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(2):1‐8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh‐2020‐004415
    1. Becking EC, Scheffer PG, Henrichs J, et al. Fetal fraction of cell‐free DNA in noninvasive prenatal testing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a nationwide retrospective cohort study of 56,110 pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;S0002‐9378(23):2128‐2132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.008

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources