Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 14;22(1):158.
doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03432-3.

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) predicted the postoperative survival rate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and the construction of a nomogram model

Affiliations

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) predicted the postoperative survival rate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and the construction of a nomogram model

Shixin Ma et al. World J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in patients with operable non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). By constructing the nomogram model, it can provide a reference for clinical work.

Methods: A total of 899 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital between January 2017 and June 2021 were retrospectively included. ALI was calculated by body mass index (BMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The optimal truncation value of ALI was obtained using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and divided into two groups. Survival analysis was represented by the Kaplan-Meier curve. The predictors of Overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the Cox proportional risk model using single factor and stepwise regression multifactor analysis. Based on the results of multi-factor Cox proportional risk regression analysis, a nomogram model was established using the R survival package. The bootstrap method (repeated sampling 1 000 times) was used for internal verification of the nomogram model. The concordance index (C-index) was used to represent the prediction performance of the nomogram model, and the calibration graph method was used to visually represent its prediction conformity. The application value of the model was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: The optimal cut-off value of ALI was 70.06, and the low ALI group (ALI < 70.06) showed a poor survival prognosis. In multivariate analyses, tumor location, pathological stage, neuroaggression, and ALI were independently associated with operable NSCLC-specific survival. The C index of OS predicted by the nomogram model was 0.928 (95% CI: 0.904-0.952). The bootstrap self-sampling method (B = 1000) was used for internal validation of the prediction model, and the calibration curve showed good agreement between the prediction and observation results of 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS. The ROC curves for 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival were plotted according to independent factors, and the AUC was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.925-0.979), 0.951 (95% CI: 0.916-0.985), and 0.939 (95% CI: 0.913-0.965), respectively. DCA shows that this model has good clinical application value.

Conclusion: ALI can be used as a reliable indicator to evaluate the prognosis of patients with operable NSCLC, and through the construction of a nomogram model, it can facilitate better individualized treatment and prognosis assessment.

Keywords: Advanced lung cancer inflammation index; Nomogram; Non-small cell lung cancer; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with different ALI levels
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Nomogram and calibration curve for predicting overall survival of NSCLC patients. (A) Nomogram model; calibration curves for 1-year (B), 2-year (C), and 3-year (D) survival rates
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ROC curve and DCA curve of prediction model. (A) ROC curves for 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival predictions; (B) 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year clinical value DCA curves

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al. Global Cancer Statistics. 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. 10.3322/caac.21660. - PubMed
    1. MOLINIER O, GOUPIL F. Five-year survival and prognostic factors according to histology in 6101 non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Respir Med Res. 2020;77:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2019.10.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MANTOVANI A, ALLAVENA P. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454(7203):436–44. doi: 10.1038/nature07205. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ALIFANO M, FALCOZ PE. Preresection serum C-reactive protein measurement and survival among patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(5):1161–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. CAO W, YU H, ZHU S, et al. Clinical significance of preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in the prognosis of resected early-stage patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2023;12(6):7065–76. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5505. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms