Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):735.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11182-x.

Patient-driven research priorities for patient-centered measurement

A Fuchsia Howard  1 , Linda Warner  2 , Lena Cuthbertson  3 , Richard Sawatzky  4   5   6
Affiliations

Patient-driven research priorities for patient-centered measurement

A Fuchsia Howard et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Patient-centred measurement (PCM) emphasizes a holistic approach wherein the voices of patients are reflected in the standardized use of patient-reported outcome and experience measures and are represented throughout the continuum of measurement activities. Given the challenges of routinely integrating patient self-reports into clinical care decisions, the perspectives of all healthcare system stakeholders, especially patients, is necessary to advance the science of PCM. The purpose of the analysis we report on here was to identify patient-driven research priorities for advancing the science of PCM.

Methods: We analyzed data from seven focus groups that were conducted across British Columbia, Canada and that included a total of 73 patients, using qualitative inductive analysis and constant comparative methods.

Results: We found that the patients conveyed a desire for PCM to contribute to healthcare decisions, specifically that their individual healthcare needs and related priorities as they see them are always front and centre, guiding all healthcare interactions. The patients' commentaries highlighted intersecting priorities for research on advancing the science of PCM that would help transform care by (1) enhancing the patient-provider relationship, (2) giving voice to patients' stories, (3) addressing inclusivity, (4) ensuring psychological safety, (5) improving healthcare services and systems to better meet patient needs, and (6) bolstering healthcare system accountability.

Conclusions: These priorities provide direction for future research efforts that would be positioned to make progress towards better health, better care, and better use of resources for individuals and for society.

Keywords: Measurement; Patient engagement; Patient-centered measurement; Patient-reported experience measures; Patient-reported outcome measures; Qualitative; Research priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intersecting priorities for research for advancing the science of PCM
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nolte E, Merkur S, Anell A, North J. Achieving person-Centred Health systems: evidence, Strategies and challenges. Cambridge University Press; 2020.
    1. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley; 2015.
    1. Greenhalgh J, Abhyankar P, McCluskey S, Takeuchi E, Velikova G. How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in oncology consultations? Qual Life Res. 2013;22(5):939–50. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0218-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, Harrow A, Di Domenico D, Croy S, et al. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(14):1480–510. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang LY, Manhas DS, Howard AF, Olson RA. Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(1):41–60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3865-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources