Effect of mineralized dentin matrix on the prognosis of bone defect and retained root after coronectomy
- PMID: 38878120
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05784-2
Effect of mineralized dentin matrix on the prognosis of bone defect and retained root after coronectomy
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of mineralized dentin matrix (MDM) on the prognosis on bone regeneration and migration of retained roots after coronectomy.
Materials and methods: Patients were divided into three groups based on the type of bone graft after coronectomy: Group C (n = 20, collagen), Group T (n = 20, tricalcium phosphate (TCP) + collagen), and Group D (n = 20, MDM + collagen). CBCT scans, conducted immediately and 6 months after surgery, were analyzed using digital software. Primary outcomes, including changes in bone defect depth and retained root migration distance, were evaluated 6 months after surgery.
Results: After 6 months, both Groups D and T exhibited greater reduction of the bone defect and lesser retained root migration than Group C (p < 0.001). Group D had greater regenerated bone volume in the distal 2 mm (73 mm3 vs. 57 mm3, p = 0.011) and lesser root migration (2.18 mm vs. 2.96 mm, p < 0.001) than Group T. The proportion of completely bone embedded retained roots was also greater in Group D than in Group C (70.0% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.003).
Conclusions: MDM is an appropriate graft material for improving bone defect healing and reducing retained root migration after coronectomy.
Clinical relevance: MDM is an autogenous material prepared chairside, which can significantly improve bone healing and reduce the risk of retained root re-eruption. MDM holds promise as a routine bone substitute material after M3M coronectomy.
Keywords: Bone regeneration; Bone substitutes; Coronectomy; Dentin; Digital technologies.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Camps-Font O, Caro-Bonfill C, Sánchez-Garcés MÀ, Gay-Escoda C (2018) Periodontal Regenerative Therapy for preventing bone defects distal to Mandibular Second molars after Surgical removal of impacted third molars: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized clinical trials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76:2482–2514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.07.025 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mazzucchi G, Lollobrigida M, Lamazza L et al (2022) Autologous dentin graft after impacted mandibular third molar extraction to prevent Periodontal Pocket Formation—A Split-Mouth Pilot Study. Materials 15:1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15041431 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cheung LK, Leung YY, Chow LK et al (2010) Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2009.11.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jun SH, Kim CH, Ahn JS et al (2013) Anatomical differences in lower third molars visualized by 2D and 3D X-ray imaging: clinical outcomes after extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Moreno-Vicente J, Schiavone-Mussano R, Clemente-Salas E et al (2015) Coronectomy versus surgical removal of the lower third molars with a high risk of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve. A bibliographical review. Med Oral e508–e517. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.20432
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources