Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 18;13(12):e035549.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035549. Epub 2024 Jun 15.

Prognostic Utility of Pericardial Effusion in the General Population: Findings From the STAAB Cohort Study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Prognostic Utility of Pericardial Effusion in the General Population: Findings From the STAAB Cohort Study

Floran Sahiti et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: The incidental finding of a pericardial effusion (PE) poses a challenge in clinical care. PE is associated with malignant conditions or severe cardiac disease but may also be observed in healthy individuals. This study explored the prevalence, determinants, course, and prognostic relevance of PE in a population-based cohort.

Methods and results: The STAAB (Characteristics and Course of Heart Failure Stages A/B and Determinants of Progression) cohort study recruited a representative sample of the population of Würzburg, aged 30 to 79 years. Participants underwent quality-controlled transthoracic echocardiography including the dedicated evaluation of the pericardial space. Of 4965 individuals included at baseline (mean age, 55±12 years; 52% women), 134 (2.7%) exhibited an incidentally diagnosed PE (median diameter, 2.7 mm; quartiles, 2.0-4.1 mm). In multivariable logistic regression, lower body mass index and higher NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels were associated with PE at baseline, whereas inflammation, malignancy, and rheumatoid disease were not. Among the 3901 participants attending the follow-up examination after a median time of 34 (30-41) months, PE was found in 60 individuals (1.5%; n=18 new PE, n=42 persistent PE). Within the follow-up period, 37 participants died and 93 participants reported a newly diagnosed malignancy. The presence of PE did not predict all-cause death or the development of new malignancy.

Conclusions: Incidental PE was detected in about 3% of individuals, with the vast majority measuring <10 mm and completely resolving. PE was not associated with inflammation markers, death, incident heart failure, or malignancy. Our findings corroborate the view of current guidelines that a small PE in asymptomatic individuals can be considered an innocent phenomenon and does not require extensive short-term monitoring.

Keywords: incidental finding; pericardial effusion; population‐based cohort; prognostic relevance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The course of PE during a median follow‐up of 34 months. PE indicates pericardial effusion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L, Baron‐Esquivias G, Bogaert J, Brucato A, Gueret P, Klingel K, Lionis C, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the task force for the diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: the European Association for Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2921–2964. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv318 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azarbal A, LeWinter MM. Pericardial effusion. Cardiol Clin. 2017;35:515–524. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2017.07.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sugiura T, Kumon Y, Kataoka H, Matsumura Y, Takeuchi H, Doi Y. Asymptomatic pericardial effusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Cardiology. 2008;110:87–91. doi: 10.1159/000110485 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Brand F, Anderson SJ, Castelli WP, Kannel WB, Feinleib M. Prevalence and correlates of posterior extra echocardiographic spaces in a free‐living population based sample (the Framingham study). Am J Cardiol. 1983;51:1207–1212. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90370-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Filippo O, Gatti P, Rettegno S, Iannaccone M, D'Ascenzo F, Lazaros G, Brucato A, Tousoulis D, Adler Y, Imazio M. Is pericardial effusion a negative prognostic marker? Meta‐analysis of outcomes of pericardial effusion. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2019;20:39–45. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000720 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources