Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 15;24(1):521.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05096-w.

Interventions that have potential to help older adults living with social frailty: a systematic scoping review

Affiliations

Interventions that have potential to help older adults living with social frailty: a systematic scoping review

Monika Kastner et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: The impact of social frailty on older adults is profound including mortality risk, functional decline, falls, and disability. However, effective strategies that respond to the needs of socially frail older adults are lacking and few studies have unpacked how social determinants operate or how interventions can be adapted during periods requiring social distancing and isolation such as the COVID-19 pandemic. To address these gaps, we conducted a scoping review using JBI methodology to identify interventions that have the best potential to help socially frail older adults (age ≥65 years).

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL (EPSCO), EMBASE and COVID-19 databases and the grey literature. Eligibility criteria were developed using the PICOS framework. Our results were summarized descriptively according to study, patient, intervention and outcome characteristics. Data synthesis involved charting and categorizing identified interventions using a social frailty framework. RESULTS: Of 263 included studies, we identified 495 interventions involving ~124,498 older adults who were mostly female. The largest proportion of older adults (40.5%) had a mean age range of 70-79 years. The 495 interventions were spread across four social frailty domains: social resource (40%), self-management (32%), social behavioural activity (28%), and general resource (0.4%). Of these, 189 interventions were effective for improving loneliness, social and health and wellbeing outcomes across psychological self-management, self-management education, leisure activity, physical activity, Information Communication Technology and socially assistive robot interventions. Sixty-three interventions were identified as feasible to be adapted during infectious disease outbreaks (e.g., COVID-19, flu) to help socially frail older adults.

Conclusions: Our scoping review identified promising interventions with the best potential to help older adults living with social frailty.

Keywords: Geriatrics; Information communication technology; Older adults; Scoping review; Self-management; Social frailty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Domains of frailty and existing gaps
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA Flowchart
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Country and continent of conduct*. *Percentages may not total to 100 due to rounding

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chatterji S, Byles J, Cutler D, Seeman T, Verdes E. Health, functioning, and disability in older adults–present status and future implications. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):563–575. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61462-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Statistics_Canada. Canada Yearbook. Seniors. 2012; http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-402-x/2012000/chap/seniors-aines/seniors.... Accessed February 2020.
    1. Kehler DS, Ferguson T, Stammers AN, et al. Prevalence of frailty in Canadians 18–79 years old in the Canadian Health Measures Survey. BMC Geriatrics. 2017;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0423-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ament BHL, de Vugt ME, Verhey FRJ, Kempen GIJM. Are physically frail older persons more at risk of adverse outcomes if they also suffer from cognitive, social, and psychological frailty? Eur J Ageing. 2014;11(3):213–219. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0308-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gobbens RJ, van Assen MA, Luijkx KG, Schols JM. The predictive validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: disability, health care utilization, and quality of life in a population at risk. Gerontologist. 2012;52(5):619–631. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr135. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding