Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jun 15;23(1):205.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02296-x.

Short-term effects of gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on high LDL cholesterol: The BASALTO randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Short-term effects of gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on high LDL cholesterol: The BASALTO randomized clinical trial

David Benaiges et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: There has been a substantial increase in the use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to treat morbid obesity despite observational evidence demonstrating the superiority of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. The main aim was to ascertain whether high LDL cholesterol levels should be considered when selecting the most appropriate surgical procedure for each patient (RYGB or SG).

Methods: In this single-center, randomized clinical trial using intention-to-treat analysis, 38 patients with severe obesity and elevated levels of LDL cholesterol were randomly assigned to undergo RYGB or SG. The primary outcome was LDL cholesterol remission at 12 months, defined as LDL cholesterol < 3.36 nmol/l without lipid-lowering medications. Secondary outcomes included changes in weight, other comorbidities, qualitative lipoprotein traits, cholesterol esters, glycoproteins, cholesterol absorption and synthesis metabolites and complications.

Results: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed that LDL cholesterol remission occurred in 66.6% of RYGB patients compared to 27.8% of SG patients (p = 0.019). Among patients completing follow-up, RYGB demonstrated superior remission (80.0% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.005). Exclusive benefits of RYGB included a reduction in large, medium, and small LDL particles. Cholesterol absorption markers showed differential behavior after both techniques: campesterol (Δ -15.2 µg/mg, 95% CI -30.2 to -0.1) decreased after RYGB, and sitosterol (Δ 21.1 µg/mg, 95% CI 0.9 to 41.2), cholestanol (Δ 30.6 µg/mg, 95% CI 14.8 to 57.9) and campesterol (Δ 18.4 µg/mg, 95% CI 4.4 to 32.3) increased after SG. No differences in weight loss, cholesterol esters, glycoproteins, cholesterol synthesis metabolites or postoperative complications were observed between techniques.

Conclusion: In conclusion, RYGB is superior to SG in terms of short-term of high LDL cholesterol remission. Furthermore, RYGB also led to a greater improvement in lipoprotein parameters that confer an atherogenic profile. Therefore, the presence of elevated levels of LDL cholesterol should be considered when determining the optimal bariatric surgery procedure for each patient.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT03975478).

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Cholesterol esters; Hypercholesterolemia; LDL cholesterol; Lipoprotein; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Primary endpoint (LDL cholesterol remission) and secondary outcomes related to LDL cholesterol. The differences in high LDL cholesterol remission (Fig. 2A) were determined using a chi-square test. Figure 2B and D show changes observed during follow-up. Negative values indicate a reduction, whereas positive values indicate an increase.  Data are expressed as the means with 95% confidence intervals. The p value refers to the comparison between groups at each time interval. The changes in these parameters were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA ( p  < 0.05) adjusted for baseline triglycerides.  LDL, low-density lipoprotein
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes in the percentage of excess weight loss (A) and percentage total weight loss (B). Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviations. Significance at p < 0.05 was determined using repeated-measures ANOVA
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Changes in cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers with RYGB and SG

References

    1. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2016 Jun 13];292:1724–37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15479938. - PubMed
    1. Schiavon CA, Ikeoka DT, De Sousa MG, Silva CRA, Bersch-Ferreira AC, De Oliveira JD, et al. Effects of gastric bypass surgery in patients with hypertension: Rationale and design for a randomised controlled trial (GATEWAY study) BMJ Open. 2014;4:1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005702. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Risstad H, Svanevik M, Kristinsson JA, Hjelmesæth J, Aasheim ET, Hofsø D, et al. Standard vs distal roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with body mass index 50 to 60 a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:1146–55. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2798. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Busetto L, Dixon J, De Luca M, Shikora S, Pories W, Angrisani L. Bariatric surgery in class i obesity: a position statement from the international federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO) Obes Surg. 2014;24:487–519. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1214-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources