Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul;34(3):344-350.
doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.05.001.

Democratizing FLASH Radiotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Democratizing FLASH Radiotherapy

Michele Moreau et al. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

FLASH radiotherapy (RT) is emerging as a potentially revolutionary advancement in cancer treatment, offering the potential to deliver RT at ultra-high dose rates (>40 Gy/s) while significantly reducing damage to healthy tissues. Democratizing FLASH RT by making this cutting-edge approach more accessible and affordable for healthcare systems worldwide would have a substantial impact in global health. Here, we review recent developments in FLASH RT and present perspective on further developments that could facilitate the democratizing of FLASH RT. These include upgrading and validating current technologies that can deliver and measure the FLASH radiation dose with high accuracy and precision, establishing a deeper mechanistic understanding of the FLASH effect, and optimizing dose delivery conditions and parameters for different types of tumors and normal tissues, such as the dose rate, dose fractionation, and beam quality for high efficacy. Furthermore, we examine the potential for democratizing FLASH radioimmunotherapy leveraging evidence that FLASH RT can make the tumor microenvironment more immunogenic, and parallel developments in nanomedicine or use of smart radiotherapy biomaterials for combining RT and immunotherapy. We conclude that the democratization of FLASH radiotherapy represents a major opportunity for concerted cross-disciplinary research collaborations with potential for tremendous impact in reducing radiotherapy disparities and extending the cancer moonshot globally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest We have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Technical areas for democratizing FLASH with potential for establishing one treatment approach for all cancer patients (1–4 All); SRB = smart radiotherapy biomaterials; APC = antigen presenting cells
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
A) Currently used fiducials with single function of providing image contrast during image-guided radiotherapy; B) Design of multifunctional smart radiotherapy biomaterials (SRBs) that can provide image contrast to guide the radiotherapy, make the tumor microenvironment more immunogenic, and synergize with immunotherapy; C) Liquid SRBs designed in the form of colloid with easy administration via similar approach used for pancreatic cancer biopsy; D) Nanoparticle SRBs that can be used to target tumors with drugs; E) MRI imaging of SRBs administered in tumors show sustained image contrast and sustained presence of SRBs within the tumor microenvironment over many days as it biodegrades and releases immunotherapy; F) Injection of SRBs in cadaver demonstrates potential to provide both CT and MRI contrast as indicated by the yellow arrows.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
a) CT image illustrating robust regression of both treated (local) and untreated (metastatic) pancreatic tumors in mice model of pancreatic cancer when combining radiotherapy with anti-CD40 immunotherapy delivered wit smart radiotherapy biomaterials prototypes (IBM); b) tumor volume data showing significant regression of both treated (local) and untreated (metastatic) tumor for the combination treatment group; c) initial results in separate study showing that SRBs could be used to combine radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Unlike in figure 3a and 3b, which use a solid SRB, the work in figure 3c uses a liquid fiducial SRB as noted in figure 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Elzawawy A. & Ngwa W. Approaching Global Oncology: The win-win model (IOP Publishing Ltd, Bristol, UK, 2022).
    1. Ngwa W, et al. Cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a Lancet Oncology Commission. Lancet Oncol 23, e251–e312 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2024). - PubMed
    1. Grossheim L, et al. Cancer and COVID-19 Experiences at African Cancer Centers: The Silver Lining. JCO Glob Oncol 7, 410–415 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irabor OC, et al. Can the Adoption of Hypofractionation Guidelines Expand Global Radiotherapy Access? An Analysis for Breast and Prostate Radiotherapy. JCO Glob Oncol 6, 667–678 (2020). - PMC - PubMed