Point-of-care testing: state-of-the art and perspectives
- PMID: 38880779
- DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0675
Point-of-care testing: state-of-the art and perspectives
Abstract
Point-of-care testing (POCT) is becoming an increasingly popular way to perform laboratory tests closer to the patient. This option has several recognized advantages, such as accessibility, portability, speed, convenience, ease of use, ever-growing test panels, lower cumulative healthcare costs when used within appropriate clinical pathways, better patient empowerment and engagement, and reduction of certain pre-analytical errors, especially those related to specimen transportation. On the other hand, POCT also poses some limitations and risks, namely the risk of lower accuracy and reliability compared to traditional laboratory tests, quality control and connectivity issues, high dependence on operators (with varying levels of expertise or training), challenges related to patient data management, higher costs per individual test, regulatory and compliance issues such as the need for appropriate validation prior to clinical use (especially for rapid diagnostic tests; RDTs), as well as additional preanalytical sources of error that may remain undetected in this type of testing, which is usually based on whole blood samples (i.e., presence of interfering substances, clotting, hemolysis, etc.). There is no doubt that POCT is a breakthrough innovation in laboratory medicine, but the discussion on its appropriate use requires further debate and initiatives. This collective opinion paper, composed of abstracts of the lectures presented at the two-day expert meeting "Point-Of-Care-Testing: State of the Art and Perspective" (Venice, April 4-5, 2024), aims to provide a thoughtful overview of the state-of-the-art in POCT, its current applications, advantages and potential limitations, as well as some interesting reflections on the future perspectives of this particular field of laboratory medicine.
Keywords: advantages; applications; limitations; point-of-care (POCT).
© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Kost, GJ. Guidelines for point-of-care testing. Improving patient outcomes. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:S111–27.
-
- Plebani, M. Does POCT reduce the risk of error in laboratory testing? Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.014 . - DOI
-
- Hicks, JM, Haeckel, R, Price, CP, Lewandrowski, K, Wu, AH. Recommendations and opinions for the use of point-of-care testing for hospitals and primary care: summary of a 1999 symposium. Clin Chim Acta 2001;303:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(00)00400-9 . - DOI
-
- Plebani, M, Laposata, M, Lundberg, GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:829–33. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpr28hwhssdnon . - DOI
-
- Nichols, JH, Christenson, RH, Clarke, W, Gronowski, A, Hammett-Stabler, CA, Jacobs, E, et al.. Executive summary. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine practice guideline: evidence-based practice for point-of-care testing. Clin Chim Acta 2007;379:14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2006.12.025 . - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous