Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 17;63(1):35-51.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0675. Print 2025 Jan 29.

Point-of-care testing: state-of-the art and perspectives

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Point-of-care testing: state-of-the art and perspectives

Mario Plebani et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Point-of-care testing (POCT) is becoming an increasingly popular way to perform laboratory tests closer to the patient. This option has several recognized advantages, such as accessibility, portability, speed, convenience, ease of use, ever-growing test panels, lower cumulative healthcare costs when used within appropriate clinical pathways, better patient empowerment and engagement, and reduction of certain pre-analytical errors, especially those related to specimen transportation. On the other hand, POCT also poses some limitations and risks, namely the risk of lower accuracy and reliability compared to traditional laboratory tests, quality control and connectivity issues, high dependence on operators (with varying levels of expertise or training), challenges related to patient data management, higher costs per individual test, regulatory and compliance issues such as the need for appropriate validation prior to clinical use (especially for rapid diagnostic tests; RDTs), as well as additional preanalytical sources of error that may remain undetected in this type of testing, which is usually based on whole blood samples (i.e., presence of interfering substances, clotting, hemolysis, etc.). There is no doubt that POCT is a breakthrough innovation in laboratory medicine, but the discussion on its appropriate use requires further debate and initiatives. This collective opinion paper, composed of abstracts of the lectures presented at the two-day expert meeting "Point-Of-Care-Testing: State of the Art and Perspective" (Venice, April 4-5, 2024), aims to provide a thoughtful overview of the state-of-the-art in POCT, its current applications, advantages and potential limitations, as well as some interesting reflections on the future perspectives of this particular field of laboratory medicine.

Keywords: advantages; applications; limitations; point-of-care (POCT).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kost, GJ. Guidelines for point-of-care testing. Improving patient outcomes. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;104:S111–27.
    1. Plebani, M. Does POCT reduce the risk of error in laboratory testing? Clin Chim Acta 2009;404:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.014 . - DOI
    1. Hicks, JM, Haeckel, R, Price, CP, Lewandrowski, K, Wu, AH. Recommendations and opinions for the use of point-of-care testing for hospitals and primary care: summary of a 1999 symposium. Clin Chim Acta 2001;303:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(00)00400-9 . - DOI
    1. Plebani, M, Laposata, M, Lundberg, GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:829–33. https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpr28hwhssdnon . - DOI
    1. Nichols, JH, Christenson, RH, Clarke, W, Gronowski, A, Hammett-Stabler, CA, Jacobs, E, et al.. Executive summary. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine practice guideline: evidence-based practice for point-of-care testing. Clin Chim Acta 2007;379:14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2006.12.025 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources