Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 14;9(2):e23.00167.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00167. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.

Education Forum: Restrictive Covenants (Non-competes) in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Every Resident Should Know Before Applying to Fellowship

Affiliations
Review

Education Forum: Restrictive Covenants (Non-competes) in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Every Resident Should Know Before Applying to Fellowship

Joshua W Hustedt et al. JB JS Open Access. .

Abstract

Introduction: More than 90% of orthopaedic surgery residents in the United States complete a fellowship program. While there is significant oversight of the educational process and rights of residents during residency, there is little standardization in fellowships in the United States. Applicants to fellowship need to be aware that they may be required to sign restrictive covenants ("non-competes") as part of the fellowship application or acceptance process. These restrictive covenants may be designed to protect the business interests of the host institution but may affect the fellow's ability to obtain employment in a geographic region.

Methods: A review of society websites designed to education fellowship applicants was reviewed. Information was gathered on whether the society provided information on restrictive covenants in fellowship programs.

Results: There is little standardization of restrictive covenants in orthopedic fellowships in the United States. Only accredited fellowships prohibit restrictive covenants in orthopedic fellowships. Pediatrics is the only sub-specialty society that provides information to applicants on restrictive covenants for fellowship applicants.

Conclusion: The current lack of standardization in the fellowship process means applicants need to be well versed in these restrictive covenants before applying. In turn, fellowships themselves, as well as subspecialty societies, should seek to be transparent in providing information on restrictive covenant requirements of their respective fellowships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A633).

References

    1. Daniels AH, DiGiovanni CW. Is subspecialty fellowship training emerging as a necessary component of contemporary orthopaedic surgery education? J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(2):218-21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruddell JH, Eltorai AEM, DePasse JM, Kuris EO, Gil JA, Cho DK, Paxton ES, Green A, Daniels AH. Trends in the orthopaedic surgery subspecialty fellowship match: assessment of 2010 to 2017 applicant and program data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(21):e139. - PubMed
    1. Hariri S, York SC, O'Connor MI, Parsley BS, McCarthy JC. Career plans of current orthopaedic residents with a focus on sex-based and generational differences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(5):e16. - PubMed
    1. Juern JS, Stahl DM, Weigelt JA. Analysis of academic medical center graduate medical education websites for policies regarding restrictive covenants in non-ACGME fellowships. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(4):924-7. - PubMed