Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Polymer Bur, Cera Bur, and Tungsten Carbide Bur in Dentin Caries Excavation of Mandibular Primary Molars: An In vivo Study
- PMID: 38882818
- PMCID: PMC11174316
- DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_842_23
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Polymer Bur, Cera Bur, and Tungsten Carbide Bur in Dentin Caries Excavation of Mandibular Primary Molars: An In vivo Study
Abstract
Conservative caries removal has become an integral part of minimally invasive dentistry (MID). Polymer and Cera burs are two feasible MID methods. The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of Polymer, Cera, and Tungsten carbide bur in dentin caries excavation of mandibular primary molars. 45 children in the age group of 6-8 years with dentin caries, not involving pulp in the second mandibular primary molars, were selected for the study. The three burs compared were polymer bur, Cera bur, and Tungsten Carbide bur. The excavation of carious lesion was performed with each burs using a slow-speed handpiece with 500-1000rpm. Caries removal efficiency was evaluated using the Visual-Tactile method and confirmed Dye detection method. The time taken to complete the caries removal was measured using a stopwatch. The patient's pain perception was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. The intergroup comparisons based on time, dye, and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS) were arrived at using Mann-Whitney and Fisher Exact tests at P < 0.0001. A statistical significance between the three groups on the time taken for caries removal at P < 0.0001. No statistical significance was observed between the three groups for caries removal efficiency and pain perception using the dye and WBFPRS scores at P > 0.001. Cera burs had shown high caries removal efficiency, which had taken less time in the excavation, with reduced pain perception followed by Tungsten Carbide bur and the polymer bur in mandibular primary molars.
Keywords: Caries excavation; dental caries; self-limiting burs.
Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Motta LJ, Martins MD, Porta KP, Bussadori SK. Aesthetic restoration of deciduous anterior teeth after removal of carious tissue with Papacarie. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20:117–20. - PubMed
-
- Alleman DS, Magne P. A Systematic approach to deep caries removal end points: The peripheral seal concept in adhesive dentistry. Quintessence Int. 2012;43:197–208. - PubMed
-
- Beeley JA, Yip HK, Stevenson AG. Chemo-chemical caries removal: A review of the techniques and latest developments. Br Dent J. 2000;188:427–30. - PubMed
-
- Correa FNP, Rocha RO, Filho LER, Muench A, Rodrigues CRMD. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: A microhardness study. J Clin Paediatr Dent. 2007;31:189–94. - PubMed
-
- Meller C, Welk A, Zeligowski T, Splieth C. Comparison of dentin caries excavation with polymer and conventional tungsten carbide burs. Quintesssence Int. 2007;38:565–69. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources