Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 15;16(5):e60375.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.60375. eCollection 2024 May.

Unraveling Patterns of Congenital Structural Malformations in Infants: A Hospital-Based Descriptive Study

Affiliations

Unraveling Patterns of Congenital Structural Malformations in Infants: A Hospital-Based Descriptive Study

Savita Pandey et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Congenital malformation studies serve several purposes, including establishing baseline rates, monitoring changes over time, exploring the origins of these defects, and helping in planning health services. Increasing public awareness about pediatric surgical interventions is another goal of these studies. However, the impact of congenital malformations is often underestimated in developing countries due to insufficient healthcare data and diagnostic facilities, particularly in rural areas. Families affected by the birth of a child with congenital malformations face significant stress and hardship. Methods The main aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical pattern of congenital structural malformations in our region (Uttarakhand, India), identify possibly associated factors of congenital malformations, and find out the immediate outcome of congenital malformations in enrolled participants. Results Among a total of 150 cases, 73 (48.7%) cases were inborn, whereas 77 (51.3%) cases were outborn. Investigation of congenital malformation revealed cleft lip or palate in 37 (24.7%) cases, congenital heart disease (CHD) in 33 (22%) cases, meningomyelocele (MMC) in 18 (12.0%) cases, anorectal malformation (ARM) in 11 (7.3%) cases, hypospadias in 10 (6.7%) cases, congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) in nine (6.0%) cases, tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) in nine (6.0%) cases, polydactyly in seven (4.7%) cases, pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) in four (2.7%) cases, duodenal atresia in three (2.0%) cases, midgut volvulus in three (2.0%) cases, umbilical sinus in two (1.3%) cases, sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) in one (0.7%) case, phimosis in one (0.7%) case, microtia in one (0.7%) case, and micrognathia in one (0.7%) case. Mortality was observed in 11 (7.3%) cases, whereas 105 (70%) cases were successfully discharged. Among 11 mortality cases, the cause of death was CHD in seven (63.2%) cases, TEF+CHD in two (18.1%) cases, MMC in one (9%) case, and duodenal atresia in one (9%) case. Conclusion Contrary to the common belief that advanced maternal age of greater than 35 years is a major cause, 86.6% of the congenital structural anomalies in our hospital-based study in Uttarakhand occurred in babies of mothers belonging to the age group of 18-30 years. Also, consanguineous marriage was observed in only 3.3% of cases, indicating that it may not be a major contributing factor causing congenital structural malformations in our region. External congenital anomalies are most commonly observed (60.7%), with cleft lip and cleft palate being the most common. The most frequently observed internal congenital anomaly is CHD (22%) followed by gastrointestinal (GI) (18.6%) and urinary anomalies (10.1%). Death and referral are commonly seen in CHD.

Keywords: congenital anomalies; congenital malformations; congenital structural anomalies; external anomalies; internal anomalies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Associated chronic systemic diseases during pregnancy
Figure 2
Figure 2. Assessment of problems occurring during pregnancy
GDM: Gestational diabetes mellitus; PIH: Pregnancy-induced hypertension; UTI: Urinary tract infection.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mode of delivery
LSCS: Lower segment cesarean section.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Birth weight as per gestational age
AGA: Appropriate for gestational age; SGA: Small for gestational age; LGA: Large for gestational age.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Assessment of congenital malformations
CHD: Congenital heart disease; CTEV: Congenital talipes equinovarus; PUG: Pelviureteric junction.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Outcome analysis
LAMA: Leaving against medical advice.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Causes of death
CHD: Congenital heart disease; TEF: Tracheoesophageal fistula; MMC: Meningomyelocele.

Similar articles

References

    1. Congenital malformations: prevalence and characteristics of newborns admitted into Federal Medical Center, Asaba. Chimah OU, Emeagui KN, Ajaegbu OC, Anazor CV, Ossai CA, Fagbemi AJ, Emeagui OD. Health Sci Rep. 2022;5:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Congenital anomalies: prevalence and risk factors. Francine R, Pascale S, Aline H. Univers J Public Health. 2014;2:58–63.
    1. Lammens M, Van Vugt JMG, Willemsen M, Van der Voorn JP, Van Bokhoven H, Donkelaar HJ. Clinical Neuroembryology: Development and Developmental Disorders of the Human Central Nervous System. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. Causes of Congenital Malformations.
    1. Prevalence of congenital anomalies in neonates and associated risk factors in a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. Sarkar S, Patra C, Dasgupta MK, Nayek K, Karmakar PR. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2:131–134. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perinatal mortality trends in a referral hospital. Kumar MR, Bhat BV, Oumachigui A. Indian J Pediatr. 1996;63:357–361. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources