Roxadustat versus placebo for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: MATTERHORN phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 38884137
- DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27410
Roxadustat versus placebo for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: MATTERHORN phase 3, double-blind, randomized controlled trial
Abstract
In patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS), response to first-line therapy is limited and transient. The MATTERHORN randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial evaluated roxadustat versus placebo for patients with transfusion-dependent, lower-risk MDS. Eligible patients had very low-, low-, or intermediate-risk MDS with or without prior erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment, and a transfusion burden of 1-4 packed red blood cell (pRBC) units every 8 weeks (Q8W). Patients were randomized (3:2) to oral roxadustat (2.5 mg/kg) or placebo, both three times weekly, with best supportive care. Primary efficacy endpoint was transfusion independence (TI) for ≥56 days within 28 weeks (TI responders). MATTERHORN was terminated due to interim analysis outcomes not meeting statistical significance. In total, 272 patients were screened, and 140 patients were enrolled (82, roxadustat, and 58, placebo). At final analysis, 38/80 (47.5%) patients and 19/57 (33.3%) in the roxadustat and placebo arms, respectively, were TI responders (p = .217). A greater percentage of patients in the roxadustat arm with a transfusion burden of ≥2 pRBC units Q4W were TI responders (36.1%; 13/36) compared with the placebo arm (11.5%; 3/26; p-nominal = .047). The seven on-study deaths (4, roxadustat, and 3, placebo) were considered unrelated to treatment. Three roxadustat patients progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. Despite MATTERHORN not meeting its primary endpoint, a numerically higher TI rate was achieved with roxadustat treatment compared with placebo. Further analyses are needed to confirm the MDS patient subgroups deriving clinical benefit from this novel treatment.
© 2024 The Author(s). American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Lewis R, Bewersdorf JP, Zeidan AM. Clinical management of anemia in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: an update on emerging therapeutic options. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:645‐657.
-
- Platzbecker U, Kubasch AS, Homer‐Bouthiette C, Prebet T. Current challenges and unmet medical needs in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2021;35(8):2182‐2198.
-
- Di Veroli A, Bellis ED, Rossi V, et al. Clinical use of ESAs in low‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes. J Rare Dis Res Treat. 2017;2(6):41‐44.
-
- Kubasch AS, Plazbecker U. Setting fire to ESA and EMA resistance: new targeted treatment options in lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):3853.
-
- Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, et al. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent‐naive, transfusion‐dependent, lower‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open‐label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023;402(10399):373‐385.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous