Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul-Aug;38(4):2099-2119.
doi: 10.1111/jvim.17124. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

Efficacy and safety of once daily oral administration of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor velagliflozin compared with twice daily insulin injection in diabetic cats

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of once daily oral administration of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor velagliflozin compared with twice daily insulin injection in diabetic cats

Stijn J M Niessen et al. J Vet Intern Med. 2024 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Options for treatment of diabetes mellitus in cats are limited to insulin injections and monitoring for hypoglycemia.

Hypothesis: Once daily sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor velagliflozin PO is noninferior to insulin injections.

Animals: Client-owned diabetic cats (127 safety; 116 efficacy assessment).

Methods: Prospective, randomized (1 mg/kg velagliflozin), positive controlled (titrated Caninsulin), open label, noninferiority field trial, comparing number of cats with treatment success in ≥1 clinical variable and ≥1 glycemic variable (margin Δ: 15%) on Day 45; secondary endpoints included glycemic and clinical assessments during 91 days.

Results: On Day 45, 29/54 (54%) velagliflozin-treated cats and 26/62 (42%) Caninsulin-treated cats showed treatment success, demonstrating noninferiority (difference -11.8%; upper 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval, -∞ to 6.3%). By Day 91, quality of life (QoL), polyuria, and polydipsia had improved in 81%, 54% and 61% (velagliflozin); on blood glucose (BG) curves, mean BG was <252 mg/dL in 42/54 (78%; velagliflozin) and 37/62 (60%; Caninsulin); minimum BG was <162 mg/dL in 41/54 (76%; velagliflozin) and 41/62 (66%; Caninsulin); serum fructosamine was <450 μmol/L in 41/54 (76%; velagliflozin) and 38/62 (61%; Caninsulin). Velagliflozin's most frequent adverse events were loose feces/diarrhea (n = 23/61, 38%), positive urine culture (n = 19/61, 31%), and nonclinical hypoglycemia (BG <63 mg/dL; n = 8/61, 13%); Caninsulin's: clinical and nonclinical hypoglycemia (n = 35/66, 53%), positive urine culture (n = 18/66, 27%), and loose feces/diarrhea (n = 10/66, 15%). Diabetic ketoacidosis occurred in 4/61 (7%; velagliflozin) and 0/66 (Caninsulin).

Conclusions and clinical importance: Once daily oral administration of velagliflozin was noninferior to insulin injections, showed good QoL and glycemia without clinical hypoglycemia.

Keywords: antidiabetic; beta‐cell; compliance; feline diabetes mellitus; glucosuria; glucotoxicity; glycemic control; prospective clinical trial; sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health initiated and funded this study and will market the studied drug in the future. All authors received remuneration for their work during the study.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Results of the inclusion/exclusion process of the study. DKA, diabetic ketoacidosis; FAS, full analysis set.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Improvement rates compared with screen (%) inrurine frequency/volume (A), water consumption (B), appetite (C) and palmigrade/plantigrade stance (D).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Change in body conditions score (BCS; 1‐9) over time in velagliflozin‐ and insulin‐treated diabetic cats over time.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Fructosamine, mean blood glucose, and minimum blood glucose (BG) over time in the full analysis set, and in the subgroups of naïve and insulin‐pretreated cats in the velagliflozin and insulin groups. Error bars represent adjusted mean ± standard error (SE) from mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Mean blood glucose for each time point of the blood glucose (BG) curves in the full analysis set, and in the subgroups of naïve and pretreated cats. Error bars represent mean ± standard deviation (SD).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Change compared with screening in quality of life in all cats, and in the subgroups of naïve and insulin‐pretreated (pre‐trd) cats in the velagliflozin and insulin groups.

References

    1. Niessen SJM, Bjornvad CB, Church DB, et al. Agreeing Language in Veterinary Endocrinology (ALIVE): diabetes mellitus—a modified Delphi‐method‐based system to create consensus disease definitions. Vet J. 2022;289:105910. - PubMed
    1. Gilor C, Niessen SJ, Furrow E, DiBartola SP. What's in a name? Classification of diabetes mellitus in veterinary medicine and why it matters. J Vet Intern Med. 2016;30(4):927‐940. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behrend E, Holford A, Lathan P, Rucinsky R, Schulman R. AAHA diabetes management guidelines for dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2018;54(1):1‐21. - PubMed
    1. Michiels L, Reusch CE, Boari A, et al. Treatment of 46 cats with porcine lente insulin—a prospective, multicentre study. J Feline Med Surg. 2008;10(5):439‐451. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zini E, Salesov E, Dupont P, et al. Glucose concentrations after insulin‐induced hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in healthy and diabetic cats. J Vet Intern Med. 2018;32(3):978‐985. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources