Clinical efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-neutralizing antibodies in immunoglobulin preparations for the treatment of agammaglobulinemia in patients with primary antibody deficiency
- PMID: 38884390
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29738
Clinical efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-neutralizing antibodies in immunoglobulin preparations for the treatment of agammaglobulinemia in patients with primary antibody deficiency
Abstract
Immunocompromised individuals are at significantly elevated risk for severe courses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In addition to vaccination, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) have been applied throughout the pandemic, with time of treatment onset and potency against the currently prevailing virus variant identified as relevant factors for medical benefit. Using data from the European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry, the present study evaluated COVID-19 cases in three groups of patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI; 981 agammaglobulinemia patients on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT); 8960 non-agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT; 14 428 patients without IGRT), and the neutralizing capacity of 1100 immunoglobulin lots against SARS-CoV-2 ("Wuhan" and Omicron strains), throughout 3 years. From the first (2020/2021) to the second (2021/2022) cold season, i.e., during the virus drift to the more contagious Omicron variants, an increase in case numbers was recorded that was comparable (~2- to 3-fold) for all three study groups. During the same period, immunoglobulin lots showed a profound nAb increase against the archetypal SARS-CoV-2 strain, yet only low levels of Omicron nAbs. Notably, shortly before the third (2022/2023) cold season, Omicron-neutralizing capacity of released immunoglobulin lots had plateaued at high levels. From the second to the third cold season, COVID-19 cases dropped markedly. While a ~6-fold case reduction was recorded for the groups of non-agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT and IEI patients not receiving IGRT, the decline was ~30-fold for the group of agammaglobulinemia patients on IGRT. These findings suggest a substantial COVID-19-protective effect of IGRT, at least for distinct groups of antibody-deficient patients.
Keywords: COVID‐19; SARS‐CoV‐2; agammaglobulinemia; intravenous immunoglobulin; neutralizing antibodies; primary immunodeficiency.
© 2024 Takeda Manufacturing Austria AG and The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Khoury DS, Cromer D, Reynaldi A, et al. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Nature Med. 2021;27:1205‐1211. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01377-8
-
- Delavari S, Abolhassani H, Abolnezhadian F, et al. Impact of SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic on patients with primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2021;41:345‐355. doi:10.1007/s10875-020-00928-x
-
- Meyts I, Bucciol G, Quinti I, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in patients with inborn errors of immunity: an international study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147:520‐531. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.010
-
- Schwaiger J, Karbiener M, Aberham C, Farcet MR, Kreil TR. No SARS‐CoV‐2 neutralization by intravenous immunoglobulins produced from plasma collected before the 2020 pandemic. J Infect Dis. 2020;222:1960‐1964. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiaa593
-
- Farcet MR, Karbiener M, Schwaiger J, Ilk R, Kreil TR. Rapidly increasing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 neutralization by intravenous immunoglobulins produced from plasma collected during the 2020 pandemic. J Infect Dis. 2022;226:1357‐1361. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiab142
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous