Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 17;28(7):377.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05770-8.

Oral microbial dysbiosis in patients with oral cavity cancers

Affiliations

Oral microbial dysbiosis in patients with oral cavity cancers

Ozge Unlu et al. Clin Oral Investig. .

Abstract

Objectives: The pathogenesis of oral cavity cancers is complex. We tested the hypothesis that oral microbiota dysbiosis is associated with oral cavity cancer.

Materials and methods: Patients with primary oral cavity cancer who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. Matching healthy individuals were recruited as controls. Data on socio-demographic and behavioral factors, self-reported periodontal measures and habits, and current dental status were collected using a structured questionnaire and periodontal chartings. In addition to self-reported oral health measures, each participant received a standard and detailed clinical examination. DNA was extracted from saliva samples from patients and healthy controls. Next-generation sequencing was performed by targeting V3-V4 gene regions of the 16 S rRNA with subsequent bioinformatic analyses.

Results: Patients with oral cavity cancers had a lower quality of oral health than healthy controls. Proteobacteria, Aggregatibacter, Haemophilus, and Neisseria decreased, while Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Lactobacillus, Gemella, and Fusobacteria increased in oral cancer patients. At the species level, C. durum, L. umeaens, N. subflava, A. massiliensis, and V. dispar were significantly lower, while G. haemolysans was significantly increased (p < 0.05). Major periodontopathogens associated with periodontal disease (P. gingivalis and F.nucleatum) increased 6.5- and 2.8-fold, respectively.

Conclusion: These data suggested that patients with oral cancer had worse oral health conditions and a distinct oral microbiome composition that is affected by personal daily habits and may be associated with the pathogenicity of the disease and interspecies interactions.

Clinical relevance: This paper demonstrates the link between oral bacteria and oral cancers, identifying mechanistic interactions between species of oral microbiome.

Keywords: Oral cavity cancers; Oral microbiota; Periodontal disease; Saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The most abundant bacterial phyla and genus. Panel A shows the alterations in the most abundant 10 bacterial phyla in oral cavity cancer and control groups. Panel B demonstrates the most abundant 20 bacterial species in all samples
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The most prevalent bacterial genus and species. Panel A demonstrates the changes in the amount of the most abundant 40 bacterial genera in oral cavity cancer patients and the control groups. Panel B shows the first 30 species with the highest incidence according to metagenomic analysis obtained from both oral cavity cancer patients and the controls in each sample (H: Patients, C: Control)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The most abundant 40 bacterial species (OTU) in oral cavity cancer patients and the control groups
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The effects of alcohol consumption and smoking habits on oral microbiota. Panel A shows the variation in the relative abundances of certain species among smokers and non-smokers. Panel B shows these alterations due to alcohol consumption
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The effect of daily brushing habits on the relative abundance of the bacterial species obtained from oral cavity cancer patients

References

    1. Cancer (IARC) (2024) https://gco.iarc.fr/
    1. Adeoye J, Hui L, Tan JY, Koohi-Moghadam M, Choi SW, Thomson P (2021) Prognostic value of non-smoking, non-alcohol drinking status in oral cavity cancer. Clin Oral Investig 25(12):6909–6918. 10.1007/s00784-021-03981-x 10.1007/s00784-021-03981-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guerrero-Preston R, Godoy-Vitorino F, Jedlicka A et al (2016) 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing identifies microbiota associated with oral cancer, human papilloma virus infection and surgical treatment. Oncotarget 7(32):51320–51334. 10.18632/oncotarget.9710 10.18632/oncotarget.9710 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deng Q, Yan L, Lin J et al (2022) A composite oral hygiene score and the risk of oral cancer and its subtypes: a large-scale propensity score-based study. Clin Oral Investig 26(3):2429–2437. 10.1007/s00784-021-04209-8 10.1007/s00784-021-04209-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marques LA, Eluf-Neto J, Figueiredo RAO et al (2008) Oral health, hygiene practices and oral cancer. Rev Saúde Pública 42(3):471–479. 10.1590/S0034-89102008000300012 10.1590/S0034-89102008000300012 - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources