A comprehensive review on doxorubicin: mechanisms, toxicity, clinical trials, combination therapies and nanoformulations in breast cancer
- PMID: 38884850
- DOI: 10.1007/s13346-024-01648-0
A comprehensive review on doxorubicin: mechanisms, toxicity, clinical trials, combination therapies and nanoformulations in breast cancer
Abstract
Doxorubicin is a key treatment for breast cancer, but its effectiveness often comes with significant side effects. Its actions include DNA intercalation, topoisomerase II inhibition, and reactive oxygen species generation, leading to DNA damage and cell death. However, it can also cause heart problems and low blood cell counts. Current trials aim to improve doxorubicin therapy by adjusting doses, using different administration methods, and combining it with targeted treatments or immunotherapy. Nanoformulations show promise in enhancing doxorubicin's effectiveness by improving drug delivery, reducing side effects, and overcoming drug resistance. This review summarizes recent progress and difficulties in using doxorubicin for breast cancer, highlighting its mechanisms, side effects, ongoing trials, and the potential impact of nanoformulations. Understanding these different aspects is crucial in optimizing doxorubicin's use and improving outcomes for breast cancer patients. This review examines the toxicity of doxorubicin, a drug used in breast cancer treatment, and discusses strategies to mitigate adverse effects, such as cardioprotective agents and liposomal formulations. It also discusses clinical trials evaluating doxorubicin-based regimens, the evolving landscape of combination therapies, and the potential of nanoformulations to optimize delivery and reduce systemic toxicity. The review also discusses the potential of liposomes, nanoparticles, and polymeric micelles to enhance drug accumulation within tumor tissues while sparing healthy organs.
Keywords: Adverse events; Breast cancer; Clinical trails; Combination therapy; Doxorubicin; Drug delivery; Nano-formulations.
© 2024. Controlled Release Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Consent for publication: NA. Competing interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
References
-
- Sathishkumar K, Chaturvedi M, Das P, Stephen S, Mathur P. Cancer incidence estimates for 2022 & projection for 2025: result from National Cancer Registry Programme, India. Indian J Med Res. 2022;156(4&5):598–607. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1821_22 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Satyanarayana L, Asthana S, Labani SP. Childhood cancer incidence in India: a review of population-based cancer registries. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51(3):218–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-014-0377-0 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hamann U, Ankel C. Breast cancer: diagnostics and therapy - the most important facts for internists. Dtsch Med Wochenschr (1946). 2018;143(4):267–78. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-104456 . - DOI
-
- Katsura C, Ogunmwonyi I, Kankam HK, Saha S. Breast cancer: presentation, investigation and management. Br J Hosp Med (London, England: 2005). 2022;83(2):1–7. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2021.0459 . - DOI
-
- Mb A, Vs R, Me J, Ao A. Breast cancer biomarkers: risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, prediction of treatment efficacy and toxicity, and recurrence. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(30):4879–98. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612819666131125145517 . - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
