Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):207.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03719-8.

Predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Affiliations

Predictors of futile recanalization after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Li-Rong Wang et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular therapy (EVT) is the most successful treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation. However, futile recanalization (FR) seriously affects the prognosis of these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate predictors of FR after EVT in patients with AIS.

Method: Patients diagnosed with AIS due to anterior circulation LVO and receiving EVT between June 2020 and October 2022 were prospectively enrolled. FR after EVT was defined as a poor 90-day prognosis (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≥ 3) despite achieving successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] classification of 2b-3). All included patients were categorized into control group (mRS score < 3) and FR group (mRS score ≥ 3). Demographic characteristics, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, smoking, etc.), stroke-specific data (NIHSS score, ASPECT score and site of occlusion), procedure data (treatment type [direct thrombectomy vs. bridging thrombectomy], degree of vascular recanalization [mTICI], procedure duration time and onset-recanalization time), laboratory indicators (lymphocytes count, neutrophils count, monocytes count, C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR], monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio [MHR], lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio [LMR], lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio [LCR], lymphocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio[LHR], total cholesterol and triglycerides.) were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore independent predictors of FR after EVT.

Results: A total of 196 patients were included in this study, among which 57 patients were included in the control group and 139 patients were included in the FR group. Age, proportion of patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, median NIHSS score, CRP level, procedure duration time, neutrophil count and NLR were higher in the FR group than in the control group. Lymphocyte count, LMR, and LCR were lower in the FR group than in the control group. There were no significant differences in platelet count, monocytes count, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, gender, smoking, atrial fibrillation, percentage of occluded sites, onset-recanalization time, ASPECT score and type of treatment between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that NLR was independently associated with FR after EVT (OR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.005-1.86, P = 0.046).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that high NLR was associated with a risk of FR in patients with AIS due to anterior circulation LVO. These findings may help clinicians determine which patients with AIS are at higher risk of FR after EVT. Our study can provide a theoretical basis for interventions in the aforementioned population.

Keywords: Acute ischemic stroke; Endovascular treatment; Futile recanalization; Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have identified a conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Global regional. National age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1151–210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herpich F, Rincon F. Management of Acute ischemic stroke. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:1654–63. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004597. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu L, Chen W, Zhou H, et al. Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of cerebrovascular disorders: executive summary and 2019 update of clinical management of ischaemic cerebrovascular diseases. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020;5:159–76. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000378. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ding Q, Liu S, Yao Y, et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of ischemic stroke, 1990–2019. Neurology. 2022;98:e279–90. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013115. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387:1723–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. - DOI - PubMed