Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 13:16:1093-1101.
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S461094. eCollection 2024.

Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour

Affiliations

Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour

Wenjie Liu et al. Int J Womens Health. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate factors predictive of the success of a slow-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening.

Methods: This retrospective study included 187 women who received dinoprostone vaginal inserts for cervical ripening. The participants were divided into two groups: the transvaginal delivery group (n = 87) and cesarean section termination group (n = 100). The correlation between the parameters present before cervical ripening with dinoprostone slow release and its success, as well as complications and adverse outcomes, was analyzed. Cesarean section predictors and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two Groups.

Results: There were statistical differences between the two groups in body mass index (BMI), height, cervical Bishop score, cephalic position, time of medication use, and fetal head position at the time of medication use (P<0.05). The optimal thresholds for identifying cesarean section in dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening were 162.5 for height (AUC = 0.61), 10.65 cm for amniotic fluid index (AUC = 0.6), S-2.5 for cephalic position (AUC = 0.61), 5.5 for bishop score of cervix (AUC = 0.65). The height, amniotic fluid index, cephalic position, and Bishop score of the cervix were included in the same model. The AUC value of the combined model was higher than the AUC value of the single factor.

Conclusion: The combined model was a better predictor of cesarean section in dinoprostone vaginal inserts for cervical ripening and labor induction. The success of cervical ripening with a dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert can be predicted by the factors that can be recognized at admission.

Keywords: cervical ripening; dinoprostone; labor induction; predictive model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curves for AFI, pro-induction fetal head position (S-) (a). ROC curves for height and post-induction cervical score and predictive model (b).

Similar articles

References

    1. Levine LD. Cervical ripening: why we do what we do. Semin Perinatol. 2020;44(2):151216. doi:10.1016/j.semperi.2019.151216 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Socha MW, Flis W, Wartęga M, et al. A review of the mechanism of action and clinical applications of osmotic dilators for cervical ripening in the induction of labor and in gynecology procedures. Med Sci Monit. 2023;27(29):e940127. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sah MK, Padhye SM. Mifepristone versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening in primigravid patients at term. Int J Reprod Contracep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):824–828. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180520 - DOI
    1. Tenore JL. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Am Family Phys. 2003;67(10):2123–2128. - PubMed
    1. Bakker R, Pierce S, Myers D. The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach. Arch Gynecol Obstetrics. 2017;296(2):167–179. doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4418-5 - DOI - PubMed