Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour
- PMID: 38887592
- PMCID: PMC11182355
- DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S461094
Predictive Factors for the Success of Vaginal Dinoprostone for the Induction of Labour
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate factors predictive of the success of a slow-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening.
Methods: This retrospective study included 187 women who received dinoprostone vaginal inserts for cervical ripening. The participants were divided into two groups: the transvaginal delivery group (n = 87) and cesarean section termination group (n = 100). The correlation between the parameters present before cervical ripening with dinoprostone slow release and its success, as well as complications and adverse outcomes, was analyzed. Cesarean section predictors and area under the curve (AUC) were compared between the two Groups.
Results: There were statistical differences between the two groups in body mass index (BMI), height, cervical Bishop score, cephalic position, time of medication use, and fetal head position at the time of medication use (P<0.05). The optimal thresholds for identifying cesarean section in dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening were 162.5 for height (AUC = 0.61), 10.65 cm for amniotic fluid index (AUC = 0.6), S-2.5 for cephalic position (AUC = 0.61), 5.5 for bishop score of cervix (AUC = 0.65). The height, amniotic fluid index, cephalic position, and Bishop score of the cervix were included in the same model. The AUC value of the combined model was higher than the AUC value of the single factor.
Conclusion: The combined model was a better predictor of cesarean section in dinoprostone vaginal inserts for cervical ripening and labor induction. The success of cervical ripening with a dinoprostone slow-release vaginal insert can be predicted by the factors that can be recognized at admission.
Keywords: cervical ripening; dinoprostone; labor induction; predictive model.
© 2024 Liu et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Prediction of the efficacy of dinoprostone slow release vaginal insert (Propess) for cervical ripening: A prospective cohort study.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018 Sep;44(9):1739-1746. doi: 10.1111/jog.13715. Epub 2018 Jul 6. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018. PMID: 29978599
-
Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial.PLoS Med. 2021 Feb 11;18(2):e1003448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003448. eCollection 2021 Feb. PLoS Med. 2021. PMID: 33571294 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr;49(4):101699. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101699. Epub 2020 Feb 1. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32018044
-
[Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Oct;45(10):521-527. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 27. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017. PMID: 28757105 French.
-
Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert: A Review in Cervical Ripening.Drugs. 2018 Oct;78(15):1615-1624. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0995-2. Drugs. 2018. PMID: 30317521 Review.
References
-
- Sah MK, Padhye SM. Mifepristone versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening in primigravid patients at term. Int J Reprod Contracep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(3):824–828. doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180520 - DOI
-
- Tenore JL. Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor. Am Family Phys. 2003;67(10):2123–2128. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources