Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Oct;103(10):4183-4191.
doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05823-8. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Improved efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) in China: a subgroup of ALPINE

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Improved efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) in China: a subgroup of ALPINE

Keshu Zhou et al. Ann Hematol. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has different epidemiology in Chinese vs. Western patients, but there are few studies of CLL/SLL in large populations of Chinese patients. ALPINE is a global phase 3 trial investigating Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors zanubrutinib vs. ibrutinib to treat relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL. Here we report results from the subgroup of Chinese patients. Adults with R/R CLL/SLL were randomized 1:1 to receive zanubrutinib (160 mg twice-daily) or ibrutinib (420 mg once-daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data were analyzed descriptively. Ninety patients were randomized in China (zanubrutinib, n = 47; ibrutinib, n = 43). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups, with fewer male patients in the zanubrutinib vs. ibrutinib group (55.3% vs. 69.8%). Median age was 60.5 years, 11% had del(17p) mutation, and 32% had tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation. With median 25.3 months follow-up, ORR was 80.9% with zanubrutinib vs. 72.1% with ibrutinib. PFS was improved with zanubrutinib vs. ibrutinib (HR = 0.34 [95% CI, 0.15, 0.77]), and the HR for OS was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.14, 1.50). Rates of Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 64.4% vs. 72.1%), AEs leading to discontinuation (6.4% vs. 14.0%), and serious TEAEs (35.6% vs. 51.2%) were lower with zanubrutinib vs. ibrutinib. Zanubrutinib demonstrated improved ORR, PFS, and OS vs. ibrutinib and a more favorable safety profile in patients with R/R CLL/SLL in China. These results are consistent with the full global population of ALPINE. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03734016, registered November 7, 2018.

Keywords: Chinese population; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Ibrutinib; Small lymphocytic lymphoma; Zanubrutinib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

L.F., L.W., T.S., and K.W. are employed by BeiGene and may hold company stock/stock options. K.Z., T.W., L.P., W.X., J.J., W.Z., Y.H., J.H., R.F., P.L., Z.L., P.L., H.J., S.G., H.Z., K.Y., Z.W., X.Z., Z.S., F.L., D.Y., and J.W. have nothing to disclose. L.Q. participates in speaker’s bureaus with BeiGene, Janssen, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Takeda.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition. AE, adverse event; PD, progressive disease
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Best overall response by INV in the Chinese subgroup (ITT). CR, complete response; CRi, complete response with incomplete bone marrow recovery; DC, discontinued prior to first assessment; INV, investigator assessment; ITT, intent-to-treat; NA, not assessed; NE, not evaluable; nPR, nodular partial response; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; PR-L, partial response with lymphocytosis; SD, stable disease
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PFS by INV (a) and OS (b) in the Chinese subgroup (ITT). INV, investigator assessment; ITT, intent-to-treat; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival

References

    1. Ou Y, Long Y, Ji L et al (2022) Trends in disease burden of chronic lymphocytic leukemia at the global, regional, and national levels from 1990 to 2019, and projections until 2030: a population-based epidemiologic study. Front Oncol 12:840616 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zelenetz AD, Gordon LI, Wierda WG et al (2015) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13(3):326–362 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gale RP (2022) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia in China. Chin Med J (Engl) 135(8):883–886 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tian Z, Liu M, Fang X et al (2022) Distinct age-related clinical features and risk assessment in Chinese with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Front Oncol 12:885150 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hallek M, Al-Sawaf O (2021) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2022 update on diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Am J Hematol 96(12):1679–1705 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources