The Five Periampullary Cancers, not Just Different Siblings but Different Families: An International Multicenter Cohort Study
- PMID: 38888860
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15555-8
The Five Periampullary Cancers, not Just Different Siblings but Different Families: An International Multicenter Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Cancer arising in the periampullary region can be anatomically classified in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA), duodenal adenocarcinoma (DAC), and ampullary carcinoma. Based on histopathology, ampullary carcinoma is currently subdivided in intestinal (AmpIT), pancreatobiliary (AmpPB), and mixed subtypes. Despite close anatomical resemblance, it is unclear how ampullary subtypes relate to the remaining periampullary cancers in tumor characteristics and behavior.
Methods: This international cohort study included patients after curative intent resection for periampullary cancer retrieved from 44 centers (from Europe, United States, Asia, Australia, and Canada) between 2010 and 2021. Preoperative CA19-9, pathology outcomes and 8-year overall survival were compared between DAC, AmpIT, AmpPB, dCCA, and PDAC.
Results: Overall, 3809 patients were analyzed, including 348 DAC, 774 AmpIT, 848 AmpPB, 1,036 dCCA, and 803 PDAC. The highest 8-year overall survival was found in patients with AmpIT and DAC (49.8% and 47.9%), followed by AmpPB (34.9%, P < 0.001), dCCA (26.4%, P = 0.020), and finally PDAC (12.9%, P < 0.001). A better survival was correlated with lower CA19-9 levels but not with tumor size, as DAC lesions showed the largest size.
Conclusions: Despite close anatomic relations of the five periampullary cancers, this study revealed differences in preoperative blood markers, pathology, and long-term survival. More tumor characteristics are shared between DAC and AmpIT and between AmpPB and dCCA than between the two ampullary subtypes. Instead of using collective definitions for "periampullary cancers" or anatomical classification, this study emphasizes the importance of individual evaluation of each histopathological subtype with the ampullary subtypes as individual entities in future studies.
© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.
References
- 
    - Adsay V, Ohike N, Tajiri T, et al. Ampullary region carcinomas: definition and site specific classification with delineation of four clinicopathologically and prognostically distinct subsets in an analysis of 249 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(11):1592–608. - DOI
 
- 
    - Lerch MM, Domschke W. Abraham Vater of the ampulla (papilla) of Vater. Gastroenterology. 2000;118(2):379. - DOI
 
- 
    - Sarmiento JM, Nagomey DM, Sarr MG, Farnell MB. Periampullary cancers: are there differences? Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(3):543–55. - DOI
 
- 
    - Stark AP, Sacks GD, Rochefort MM, et al. Long-term survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2016;159(6):1520–7. - DOI
 
- 
    - Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, et al. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Is cure possible? Ann Surg. 2008;247(3):456–62. - DOI
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
 
        