Proposed Quality Indicators for Aspects of Pediatric Acute Otitis Media Management
- PMID: 38888942
- PMCID: PMC11098001
- DOI: 10.1177/19160216241248538
Proposed Quality Indicators for Aspects of Pediatric Acute Otitis Media Management
Abstract
Background: The high incidence of pediatric acute otitis media (AOM) makes the implications of overdiagnosis and overtreatment far-reaching. Quality indicators (QIs) for AOM are limited, drawing from generalized upper respiratory infection QIs, or locally developed benchmarks. Recognizing this, we sought to develop pediatric AOM QIs to build a foundation for future quality improvement efforts.
Methods: Candidate indicators (CIs) were extracted from existing guidelines and position statements. The modified RAND Corporation/University of California, Los Angeles (RAND/UCLA) appropriateness methodology was used to select the final QIs by an 11-member expert panel consisting of otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons, a pediatrician and family physician.
Results: Twenty-seven CIs were identified after literature review, with an additional CI developed by the expert panel. After the first round of evaluations, the panel agreed on 4 CIs as appropriate QIs. After an expert panel meeting and subsequent second round of evaluations, the panel agreed on 8 final QIs as appropriate measures of high-quality care. The 8 final QIs focus on topics of antimicrobial management, specialty referral, and tympanostomy tube counseling.
Conclusions: Evidence of variable and substandard care persists in the diagnosis and management of pediatric AOM despite the existence of high-quality guidelines. This study proposes 8 QIs which compliment guideline recommendations and are meant to facilitate future quality improvement initiatives that can improve patient outcomes.
Keywords: acute otitis media; infectious diseases; otitis media; quality; quality improvement; quality indicators.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Quality indicators for the diagnosis and management of pediatric tonsillitis.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Dec;139:110441. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110441. Epub 2020 Oct 13. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 33120099
-
Quality Indicators for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020 Jul;34(4):519-531. doi: 10.1177/1945892420912158. Epub 2020 Mar 24. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020. PMID: 32208748
-
Quality Indicators for the Diagnosis and Management of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):e991-e1000. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003205. Otol Neurotol. 2021. PMID: 34049327
-
Palliative Care Quality Indicators for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease Due to Cirrhosis.Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jan;62(1):84-92. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4339-3. Epub 2016 Nov 1. Dig Dis Sci. 2017. PMID: 27804005 Free PMC article.
-
Quality Indicators for Appropriate Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Adults: A Systematic Review and RAND-modified Delphi Procedure.Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 3;70(6):1075-1082. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz362. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 31056690 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Quality Indicators in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review.J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251330627. doi: 10.1177/19160216251330627. Epub 2025 Apr 25. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025. PMID: 40277281 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical