Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 18;32(7):442.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08631-y.

To become part of the team-patient experiences of participating in decision-making for a new treatment (proton beam therapy)

K Sjövall  1 , K Ahlberg  2 , P Fessé  2   3 , P Fransson  4 , I Kristensen  5 , E Ohlsson-Nevo  6 , L Åkeflo  2 , U Langegård  2   7
Affiliations

To become part of the team-patient experiences of participating in decision-making for a new treatment (proton beam therapy)

K Sjövall et al. Support Care Cancer. .

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experience of participation in the treatment decision of proton beam therapy versus conventional radiotherapy.

Background: Proton beam therapy (PBT) has become a treatment option for some cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. The decision to give PBT instead of conventional radiotherapy (CRT) needs to be carefully planned together with the patient to ensure that the degree of participation is based on individuals' preferences. There is a knowledge gap of successful approaches to support patients' participation in the decision-making process, which is particularly important when it comes to the situation of having to choose between two treatment options such as PBT and CRT, with similar expected outcomes.

Method: We conducted a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected from interviews with patients who received PBT for their brain tumor. Transcribed verbatims from interviews with 22 patients were analyzed regarding experiences of participation in the decision-making process leading to PBT.

Findings: Participants experienced their participation in the decision-making process to a varying degree, and with individual preferences. Four themes emerged from data: to be a voice that matters, to get control over what will happen, being in the hand of doctors' choice, and feeling selected for treatment.

Conclusion: A decision for treatment with PBT can be experienced as a privilege but can also cause stress as it might entail practical issues affecting everyday life in a considerable way. For the patient to have confidence in the decision-making process, patients' preferences, expectations, and experiences must be included by the healthcare team. Including the patient in the healthcare team as an equal partner by confirming the person enables and facilitates for patients' voice to be heard and reckoned with. Person-centered care building on a partnership between patients and healthcare professionals should provide the right basis for the decision-making process.

Keywords: Participation in care; Proton beam therapy; Radiotherapy; Shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The findings demonstrate participants’ various experiences of participation in the treatment decision-making process for PBT
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization (1994) A declaration on the promotion of patients’ rights in Europe. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe
    1. Health and Medical Services Act (1982:763) Retrieved from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/doku ent-lagar/ dokum ent/svensk-forfattningssamling/patientsakerhet slag-20106 59_sfs-2010
    1. Patient law (2014:821) Retrieved from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/doku ent-lagar/ dokum ent/svensk-forfattningssamling/patientsakerhet slag-20106 59_sfs-2010
    1. Patient Safety Act(SFS 2010:659) Retrieved from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/doku ent-lagar/ dokum ent/svensk-forfattningssamling/patientsakerhet slag-20106 59_sfs-2010
    1. Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(1):114–31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551638. - DOI - PMC - PubMed