Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):152.
doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01333-1.

DeepLeish: a deep learning based support system for the detection of Leishmaniasis parasite from Giemsa-stained microscope images

Affiliations

DeepLeish: a deep learning based support system for the detection of Leishmaniasis parasite from Giemsa-stained microscope images

Eden Tekle et al. BMC Med Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: Leishmaniasis is a vector-born neglected parasitic disease belonging to the genus Leishmania. Out of the 30 Leishmania species, 21 species cause human infection that affect the skin and the internal organs. Around, 700,000 to 1,000,000 of the newly infected cases and 26,000 to 65,000 deaths are reported worldwide annually. The disease exhibits three clinical presentations, namely, the cutaneous, muco-cutaneous and visceral Leishmaniasis which affects the skin, mucosal membrane and the internal organs, respectively. The relapsing behavior of the disease limits its diagnosis and treatment efficiency. The common diagnostic approaches follow subjective, error-prone, repetitive processes. Despite, an ever pressing need for an accurate detection of Leishmaniasis, the research conducted so far is scarce. In this regard, the main aim of the current research is to develop an artificial intelligence based detection tool for the Leishmaniasis from the Geimsa-stained microscopic images using deep learning method.

Methods: Stained microscopic images were acquired locally and labeled by experts. The images were augmented using different methods to prevent overfitting and improve the generalizability of the system. Fine-tuned Faster RCNN, SSD, and YOLOV5 models were used for object detection. Mean average precision (MAP), precision, and Recall were calculated to evaluate and compare the performance of the models.

Results: The fine-tuned YOLOV5 outperformed the other models such as Faster RCNN and SSD, with the MAP scores, of 73%, 54% and 57%, respectively.

Conclusion: The currently developed YOLOV5 model can be tested in the clinics to assist the laboratorists in diagnosing Leishmaniasis from the microscopic images. Particularly, in low-resourced healthcare facilities, with fewer qualified medical professionals or hematologists, our AI support system can assist in reducing the diagnosing time, workload, and misdiagnosis. Furthermore, the dataset collected by us will be shared with other researchers who seek to improve upon the detection system of the parasite. The current model detects the parasites even in the presence of the monocyte cells, but sometimes, the accuracy decreases due to the differences in the sizes of the parasite cells alongside the blood cells. The incorporation of cascaded networks in future and the quantification of the parasite load, shall overcome the limitations of the currently developed system.

Keywords: Deep learning; Faster RCNN; Leishmaniasis; Microscopic image; Object detection; SSD; YOLOV5.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Microscopic image of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (indicated by red arrows; the black arrow indicates monocyte)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
General block diagram of the developed system
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dataset distribution and variability
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Image blurring using Gaussian filter. a Orignal image, b Gaussian blurring with a 3 × 3 kernel
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Evaluation results using YOLO V5: (A) MAP at IoU 0.5, (B) MAP at IoU 0.75:0.95, (C) Precision, (D) Recall
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Shows test images detected by the SSD-trained model
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Performance comparison between the three models

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. von Chamier L, Laine RF, Henriques R. Artificial intelligence for microscopy: what you should know, Biochem. Soc. Trans 47;4:1029–1040, 2019, 10.1042/BST20180391. - PubMed
    1. Yu K-H, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2(10):719–31. 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z. - PubMed
    1. Xing F, Yang L. Chapter 4 - Machine learning and its application in microscopic image analysis, in The Elsevier and MICCAI Society Book Series, G. Wu, D. Shen, and M. R. B. T.-M. L. and M. I. Sabuncu, Eds. Academic Press, 2016. 97–127.
    1. Mirbabaie M, Stieglitz S, Frick NRJ. Artificial intelligence in disease diagnostics: a critical review and classification on the current state of research guiding future direction. Health Technol (Berl) 2021;11(4):693–731. doi: 10.1007/s12553-021-00555-5. - DOI
    1. Ghimire PG, Ghimire P, Adhikari J, Chapagain A. A case report of visceral leishmaniasis and malaria co-infection with pancytopenia and splenomegaly - a diagnostic challenge. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4478-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources