Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):1625.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19113-5.

The association between screen time exposure and myopia in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The association between screen time exposure and myopia in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis

Zhiqiang Zong et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to systematically review epidemiological evidence on associations between screen time exposure and myopia in children and adolescents, and to quantitatively evaluate summary effect estimates from existing literature.

Method: There were three online databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, for epidemiological studies on screen time exposure and myopia published before June 1, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the correlation between screen time exposure and myopia using random or fixed-effect models by exposure type (categorical/continuous). We also performed subgroup analysis by screen device type, study quality, geographic region, and research period.

Results: We searched 7,571 records from three databases and identified 19 eligible studies, including 14 high-quality studies and 5 moderate-quality studies. Meta-analyses suggested that there was a statistically significant correlation between screen time (high vs. low) and myopia. The pooled ORs with 95%CIs were respectively 2.24 (1.47-3.42) for cross-sectional studies, and 2.39 (2.07-2.76) for cohort studies. We also found a significant association between continuous exposure to screen time (per 1 h/d increase) and myopia in cohort studies. The pooled ORs with 95%CIs were 1.07 (1.01-1.13). In subgroup analysis stratified by screen device type in cross-sectional studies, screen time exposures from computers (categorical: OR = 8.19, 95%CI: 4.78-14.04; continuous: OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.10-1.35) and televisions (categorical: OR = 1.46, 95%CI: 1.02-2.10) were associated with myopia, while smartphones were not. Although publication bias was detected, the pooled results did not show significant changes after adjustment using the trim and fill method.

Conclusion: Our findings support that screen time exposure was significantly associated with myopia in children and adolescents. Notably, screen time exposure from computers may have the most significant impact on myopia.

Keywords: Children; Meta-analysis; Myopia; Public health; Screen time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flowchart of literature search
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot for the association between screen time exposure and risk of myopia in children and adolescents. (A) screen time (high vs. low) and myopia in cross-sectional studies; (B) screen time (high vs. low) and myopia in cohort studies; (C) screen time (per 1 h/d increase) and myopia in cross-sectional studies; (D) screen time (per 1 h/d increase) and myopia in cohort studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Funnel plots show the risk of publication bias in the meta-analysis. (A) screen time (high vs. low) and myopia in cross-sectional studies; (B) screen time (per 1 h/d increase) and myopia in cross-sectional studies
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sensitivity analysis using leave-one-out method for the association between screen time exposure and myopia. (A) screen time (high vs. low) and myopia in cross-sectional studies; (B) screen time (per 1 h/d increase) and myopia in cross-sectional studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1739–48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60272-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu Y, Wang L, Xu Y, Pang Z, Mu G. The influence of the choroid on the onset and development of myopia: from perspectives of choroidal thickness and blood flow. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(7):730–8. doi: 10.1111/aos.14773. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang J, Ouyang X, Fu H, Hou X, Liu Y, Xie Y, Yu H, Wang G. Advances in biomedical study of the myopia-related signaling pathways and mechanisms. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;145:112472. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112472. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ha A, Kim CY, Shim SR, Chang IB, Kim YK. Degree of myopia and Glaucoma risk: a dose-response Meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;236:107–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bullimore MA, Ritchey ER, Shah S, Leveziel N, Bourne RRA, Flitcroft DI. The risks and benefits of Myopia Control. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):1561–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.032. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources