Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2024 Jun 18;64(1):48.
doi: 10.1186/s42358-024-00386-8.

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment

Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto et al. Adv Rheumatol. .

Erratum in

  • Correction to: II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment.
    Dos Reis-Neto ET, Seguro LPC, Sato EI, Borba EF, Klumb EM, Costallat LTL, das Chagas Medeiros MM, Bonfá E, Araújo NC, Appenzeller S, de Oliveira E Silva Montandon AC, Yuki EFN, de Andrade Teixeira RC, Telles RW, do Egypto DCS, Ribeiro FM, Gasparin AA, de Araujo Junior AS, Neiva CLS, Calderaro DC, Monticielo OA. Dos Reis-Neto ET, et al. Adv Rheumatol. 2024 Oct 29;64(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s42358-024-00423-6. Adv Rheumatol. 2024. PMID: 39472991 No abstract available.

Abstract

Objective: To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods: Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.

Results: All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.

Conclusion: This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fanouriakis A, Tziolos N, Bertsias G, Boumpas D. Update οn the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(1):14–21. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Vilar MJ, Sato EI. Estimating the incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus in a tropical region (Natal, Brazil). Lupus. 2002;11(8):528–32. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Klumb E, Scheinberg M, Souza V, Xavier R, Azevedo V, McElwee E, et al. The landscape of systemic lupus erythematosus in Brazil: an expert panel review and recommendations. Lupus 2021;30:1684–95. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Klumb EM, Silva CA, Lanna CC, Sato EI, Borba EF, Brenol JC, et al. Consensus of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the diagnosis, management and treatment of lupus nephritis. Rev Bras Reumatol 2015;55:1–21. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Moberg J, Oxman A, Rosenbaum S, Schünemann H, Guyatt G, Flottorp S, et al. The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions. Health Res Policy Syst 2018;16:45. - PubMed - PMC - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms