A Comparison and Safety Evaluation of Micellar versus Standard Vitamin D3 Oral Supplementation in a Randomized, Double-Blind Human Pilot Study
- PMID: 38892507
- PMCID: PMC11174535
- DOI: 10.3390/nu16111573
A Comparison and Safety Evaluation of Micellar versus Standard Vitamin D3 Oral Supplementation in a Randomized, Double-Blind Human Pilot Study
Abstract
The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate and compare bioavailability and safety of two Vitamin D3 formulations (softgels) in healthy adults, at single daily doses of 1000 and 2500 IU, over a 60-day period. A total of 69 participants were initially screened for eligibility in a double-blind randomized study with a four-arm parallel design; 35 participants were randomized to treatment groups: (1) standard Vitamin D3 1000 IU (STD1000), (2) micellar Vitamin D3 1000 IU (LMD1000), (3) standard Vitamin D3 2500 IU (STD2500), and (4) micellar Vitamin D3 2500 IU (LMD2500). Serum Vitamin D concentrations were determined through calcifediol [25(OH)D] at baseline (=before treatment), at day 5, 10, and 15 (=during treatment), at day 30 (=end of treatment), and at day 45 and 60 (=during follow-up/post treatment). Safety markers and minerals were evaluated at baseline and at day 30 and day 60. The pharmacokinetic parameters with respect to iAUC were found to be significantly different between LMD1000 vs. STD1000: iAUC(5-60): 992 ± 260 vs. 177 ± 140 nmol day/L; p < 0.05, suggesting up to 6 times higher Vitamin D3 absorption of LMD when measured incrementally. During follow-up, participants in the LMD1000 treatment group showed approx. 7 times higher Vitamin D3 concentrations than the STD1000 group (iAUC(30-60): 680 ± 190 vs. 104 ± 91 nmol day/L; p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the pharmacokinetics of the higher dosing groups STD2500 and LMD2500. No significant changes in serum 1,25(OH)2D concentrations or other biochemical safety markers were detected at day 60; no excess risks of hypercalcemia (i.e., total serum calcium > 2.63 mmol/L) or other adverse events were identified. LMD, a micellar delivery vehicle for microencapsulating Vitamin D3 (LipoMicel®), proved to be safe and only showed superior bioavailability when compared to standard Vitamin D at the lower dose of 1000 IU. This study has clinical trial registration: NCT05209425.
Keywords: bioavailability; cholecalciferol; delivery systems; micelles; pharmacokinetics; supplementation; vitamin D.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors J.S. (Julia Solnier), Y.Z., Y.C.K., M.D., Y.S.R., and C.C. are employees of ISURA and declare no conflicts of interest (except where noted below for Y.C.K. and C.C.). ISURA is a not-for-profit independent organization. J.B. and J.S. (Janet See) are employees of Factors Group. T.G. receives fees from the Factors Group for various projects. R.J.G. is the owner of the Factors Group of Companies. S.W. is a consultant to InovoBiologic Inc. (Calgary, AB, Canada). The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Patent Pending for LipoMicel® Matrix—Eutectic Matrix for Nutraceutical Compositions lists inventors as: R.J.G., S.W., Y.C.K., and C.C. No inventor benefits from this, and the ownership belongs to InovoBiologic Inc. J.B. was employed by the company Brix Wellness, Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Randomized placebo-controlled trial of high-dose prenatal third-trimester vitamin D3 supplementation in Bangladesh: the AViDD trial.Nutr J. 2013 Apr 12;12:47. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-47. Nutr J. 2013. PMID: 23587190 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A pilot-randomized, double-blind crossover trial to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of orally administered 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and vitamin D3 in healthy adults with differing BMI and in adults with intestinal malabsorption.Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Sep 1;114(3):1189-1199. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab123. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34008842 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Dose-response effects of supplementation with calcifediol on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status and its metabolites: A randomized controlled trial in older adults.Clin Nutr. 2018 Jun;37(3):808-814. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Mar 31. Clin Nutr. 2018. PMID: 28433267 Clinical Trial.
-
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 28;5(5):CD010858. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010858.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32462740 Free PMC article.
-
Is calcifediol better than cholecalciferol for vitamin D supplementation?Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1697-1711. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4520-y. Epub 2018 Apr 30. Osteoporos Int. 2018. PMID: 29713796 Review.
Cited by
-
Recent Advances in the Use of Vitamin D Organic Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery.Biomolecules. 2024 Aug 30;14(9):1090. doi: 10.3390/biom14091090. Biomolecules. 2024. PMID: 39334856 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical