Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 May 22;16(11):1573.
doi: 10.3390/nu16111573.

A Comparison and Safety Evaluation of Micellar versus Standard Vitamin D3 Oral Supplementation in a Randomized, Double-Blind Human Pilot Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Comparison and Safety Evaluation of Micellar versus Standard Vitamin D3 Oral Supplementation in a Randomized, Double-Blind Human Pilot Study

Julia Solnier et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate and compare bioavailability and safety of two Vitamin D3 formulations (softgels) in healthy adults, at single daily doses of 1000 and 2500 IU, over a 60-day period. A total of 69 participants were initially screened for eligibility in a double-blind randomized study with a four-arm parallel design; 35 participants were randomized to treatment groups: (1) standard Vitamin D3 1000 IU (STD1000), (2) micellar Vitamin D3 1000 IU (LMD1000), (3) standard Vitamin D3 2500 IU (STD2500), and (4) micellar Vitamin D3 2500 IU (LMD2500). Serum Vitamin D concentrations were determined through calcifediol [25(OH)D] at baseline (=before treatment), at day 5, 10, and 15 (=during treatment), at day 30 (=end of treatment), and at day 45 and 60 (=during follow-up/post treatment). Safety markers and minerals were evaluated at baseline and at day 30 and day 60. The pharmacokinetic parameters with respect to iAUC were found to be significantly different between LMD1000 vs. STD1000: iAUC(5-60): 992 ± 260 vs. 177 ± 140 nmol day/L; p < 0.05, suggesting up to 6 times higher Vitamin D3 absorption of LMD when measured incrementally. During follow-up, participants in the LMD1000 treatment group showed approx. 7 times higher Vitamin D3 concentrations than the STD1000 group (iAUC(30-60): 680 ± 190 vs. 104 ± 91 nmol day/L; p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between the pharmacokinetics of the higher dosing groups STD2500 and LMD2500. No significant changes in serum 1,25(OH)2D concentrations or other biochemical safety markers were detected at day 60; no excess risks of hypercalcemia (i.e., total serum calcium > 2.63 mmol/L) or other adverse events were identified. LMD, a micellar delivery vehicle for microencapsulating Vitamin D3 (LipoMicel®), proved to be safe and only showed superior bioavailability when compared to standard Vitamin D at the lower dose of 1000 IU. This study has clinical trial registration: NCT05209425.

Keywords: bioavailability; cholecalciferol; delivery systems; micelles; pharmacokinetics; supplementation; vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors J.S. (Julia Solnier), Y.Z., Y.C.K., M.D., Y.S.R., and C.C. are employees of ISURA and declare no conflicts of interest (except where noted below for Y.C.K. and C.C.). ISURA is a not-for-profit independent organization. J.B. and J.S. (Janet See) are employees of Factors Group. T.G. receives fees from the Factors Group for various projects. R.J.G. is the owner of the Factors Group of Companies. S.W. is a consultant to InovoBiologic Inc. (Calgary, AB, Canada). The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Patent Pending for LipoMicel® Matrix—Eutectic Matrix for Nutraceutical Compositions lists inventors as: R.J.G., S.W., Y.C.K., and C.C. No inventor benefits from this, and the ownership belongs to InovoBiologic Inc. J.B. was employed by the company Brix Wellness, Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incremental average serum concentrations of 25(OH)D in healthy participants after baseline subtraction at various time points. Mean ± SEM; significance was calculated using the Mann–Whitney test with Holm–Šídák multiple comparison correction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Incremental average serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D in healthy participants at various time points. Mean ± SEM; significance was calculated using the Mann–Whitney test with Holm–Šídák multiple comparison correction.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Increase in serum (a) 25(OH)D and (b) 1,25(OH)2D concentrations over the 60-day study period. Incremental Area Under Curve (iAUC) values obtained from subtraction of baseline values for each participant at various time points were evaluated. Mean ± SEM; * denotes p ≤ 0.05 using the Mann–Whitney test with Holm–Šídák multiple comparison correction; ns denotes “not significant”.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mungai L.N.W., Mohammed Z., Maina M., Anjumanara O. Vitamin D Review: The Low Hanging Fruit for Human Health. J. Nutr. Metab. 2021;2021:6335681. doi: 10.1155/2021/6335681. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dominguez L.J., Farruggia M., Veronese N., Barbagallo M. Vitamin D Sources, Metabolism, and Deficiency: Available Compounds and Guidelines for Its Treatment. Metabolites. 2021;11:255. doi: 10.3390/metabo11040255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeLuca H.F. Overview of general physiologic features and functions of vitamin D. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004;80:1689S–1696S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.6.1689S. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maurya V.K., Aggarwal M. Factors influencing the absorption of vitamin D in GIT: An overview. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017;54:3753–3765. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2840-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christakos S., Dhawan P., Verstuyf A., Verlinden L., Carmeliet G. Vitamin D: Metabolism, Molecular Mechanism of Action, and Pleiotropic Effects. Physiol. Rev. 2016;96:365–408. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data